LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25111: Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the restore route.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25111 is a high-severity command injection issue in Copeland XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and earlier. An authenticated attacker could remotely run operating system commands through the restore function. This matters because XWEB systems may support operational environments, and compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Prioritize validation for operational sites using Copeland XWEB Pro. The issue is high impact but requires authenticated high-privilege access, so urgency depends on exposure, account controls, and network reachability. Treat internet-facing or broadly accessible management interfaces as higher priority.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-78 OS command injection in requests sent to the restore route. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.0, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and high CIA impact. The source data names XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior, but product-version mapping appears incomplete.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Copeland XWEB Pro 1.12.1 or earlier is reachable over a network by authenticated users. The bundle also lists XWEB 300D PRO, 500D PRO, and 500B PRO, but their affected version details are unclear and should be verified against vendor guidance.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is stated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked CISA KEV. Exploitation requires authentication with high privileges and targets the restore route. Successful exploitation could provide remote code execution on the affected system.

Researcher notes

The public bundle contains inconsistent affected-product detail: the description says XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior, while listed affected products show version “0” with default status unaffected. Use the CISA advisory and Copeland update page to resolve exact applicability before declaring systems vulnerable.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Copeland’s System Software Update page for applicable updates or instructions.
  • Review CISA advisory ICSA-26-057-10 for vendor-confirmed remediation guidance.
  • Restrict XWEB management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Limit restore-function access to necessary privileged administrators.
  • Monitor for unusual restore activity or unexpected administrative actions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro systems in the environment.
  • Verify each device model and software version against vendor guidance.
  • Confirm whether any system runs XWEB Pro 1.12.1 or earlier.
  • Check whether management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for suspicious restore-route or backup-restore activity.
  • Confirm remediation status after applying vendor-directed updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25111 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25111Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CopelandCopeland XWEB 300D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500B PRO0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.