LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25089: A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability...

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests

CriticalCVSS 9.1Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25089 is a critical Fortinet FortiSandbox command injection flaw. An unauthenticated remote attacker may execute unauthorized system commands through crafted HTTP requests. Because CISA KEV lists it, treat exploitation as active and prioritize exposed FortiSandbox deployments immediately.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent perimeter-security issue. The flaw is unauthenticated, remote, critical severity, and KEV-listed, so affected deployments should be remediated ahead of routine patch cycles.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-78 OS command injection affecting FortiSandbox 5.0.0-5.0.5, 4.4.0-4.4.8, all 4.2 versions, and FortiSandbox Cloud/PaaS 5.0.4-5.0.5. CVSS v3.1 is 9.1 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using FortiSandbox appliances, FortiSandbox Cloud, or FortiSandbox PaaS in the listed versions are potentially exposed, especially where HTTP interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is supported by the CISA KEV listing. The provided bundle does not include exploit details, affected endpoints, indicators, or fixed version numbers beyond Fortinet's advisory reference.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports critical impact and active exploitation, but the provided sources do not include endpoint details, payloads, indicators, or explicit fixed versions. Avoid assuming scope outside the named FortiSandbox product families and versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Fortinet PSIRT FG-IR-26-141 and apply the vendor-specified fix.
  • Inventory all FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud, and FortiSandbox PaaS versions.
  • Restrict HTTP access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-reachable or partner-reachable instances.
  • Contact Fortinet support if Cloud or PaaS remediation status is unclear.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed versions against the affected ranges in the CVE record.
  • Check whether FortiSandbox HTTP interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Verify Fortinet advisory remediation has been applied or scheduled.
  • Review access logs for unusual unauthenticated HTTP activity.
  • Track CISA KEV requirements for operational deadlines.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25089 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA-ADP
Date added
KEV reference

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: activeAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C3.95.9fortinet

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25089Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. Added to KEVCISA-ADP

    CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities metadata lists this CVE as known exploited.

  4. ADP timelineCISA-ADP

    CVE-2026-25089 added to CISA KEV

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvcother:kev
  • 2026-07-16T00:00:00.000Z: CVE-2026-25089 added to CISA KEV
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiSandbox5.0.0, 4.4.0, 4.2.1unaffected
FortinetFortiSandbox Cloud5.0.4unaffected
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS5.0.4unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.