LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25088: An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fo...

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

MediumCVSS 5.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25088 is an authenticated SQL injection issue in Fortinet FortiNDR. A logged-in attacker could send crafted HTTP requests that may lead to unauthorized code or command execution. The business risk is most relevant where FortiNDR is reachable by many users or exposed beyond tightly controlled administration networks.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled but important security update. Escalate priority if FortiNDR is internet-reachable, broadly accessible internally, or used in sensitive monitoring environments where command execution could undermine trust in detection operations.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-89 in FortiNDR 7.6.0-7.6.2, 7.4.0-7.4.9, and all 7.2, 7.1, and 7.0 releases. CVSS 3.1 is 5.1 with network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running affected FortiNDR versions, especially systems with HTTP management or application interfaces reachable by authenticated users. The source bundle marks other versions as unaffected by default but does not provide fixed-version details.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not establish active exploitation; KEV is false. Exploitation requires authentication and crafted HTTP requests. Public evidence in the bundle supports proof-of-concept maturity via CVSS E:P, but no exploit procedure or real-world activity is cited.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for affected ranges, vulnerability class, prerequisites, and CVSS. The bundle does not include fixed release numbers, workarounds, affected endpoints, or confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming unauthenticated impact or internet-scale exploitation without additional vendor or KEV evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Fortinet PSIRT FG-IR-26-134 for official fixed releases and upgrade guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for FortiNDR exposed outside restricted management networks.
  • Limit FortiNDR access to trusted administrators and controlled network paths.
  • Review accounts with FortiNDR access and remove unnecessary privileges.
  • Monitor FortiNDR HTTP and authentication logs for suspicious authenticated activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all FortiNDR appliances and record exact software versions.
  • Compare versions against affected 7.6, 7.4, 7.2, 7.1, and 7.0 ranges.
  • Confirm whether FortiNDR interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review recent authenticated HTTP activity for unusual requests or account behavior.
  • After remediation, verify the installed version is outside the affected range.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25088 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:X

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:X2.82.5fortinet

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25088Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:X

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiNDR7.6.0, 7.4.0, 7.2.0, 7.1.0, 7.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.