LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25037: Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed during system setup, enabling remote code execution.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25037 is a high-severity command injection issue in Copeland XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior. An authenticated attacker with high privileges could cause remote code execution by configuring a malicious LCD state later processed during setup. This matters most for organizations using affected Copeland XWEB Pro systems in operational environments.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority operational technology remediation item if Copeland XWEB Pro is deployed. The privilege requirement lowers likelihood, but remote code execution impact is severe. Prioritize version validation, administrative access review, and vendor-guided updates.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-78 OS command injection. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.0: network attack vector, high attack complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Public data attributes the issue to XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior, with CISA ICS advisory and Copeland update references.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Copeland XWEB Pro systems are reachable by authenticated administrative users over a network. The source bundle does not confirm internet exposure patterns, default configurations, or a specific fixed version. Asset owners should verify deployed XWEB Pro versions and access paths.

Exploitation context

The sources do not indicate known active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Exploitation requires authentication with high privileges and a specific configuration path, but successful exploitation could allow remote code execution with serious operational impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is somewhat incomplete. The description names XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior, while the affected-product entries show PRO models with version value “0” and default status “unaffected.” Use the CISA advisory, CSAF record, and Copeland update page as authoritative follow-up sources before final scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Copeland’s System Software Update page for applicable updates or guidance.
  • Review CISA advisory ICSA-26-057-10 for vendor-recommended actions.
  • Restrict network access to XWEB Pro management interfaces.
  • Limit administrative access to trusted, necessary users only.
  • Monitor vendor and CISA updates for fixed-version clarification.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Copeland XWEB Pro deployments and record software versions.
  • Confirm whether any systems run XWEB Pro 1.12.1 or prior.
  • Review administrative account access to affected systems.
  • Verify management interfaces are not broadly reachable.
  • Document remediation status against Copeland and CISA guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25037 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25037Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CopelandCopeland XWEB 300D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500B PRO0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.