LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24966: WordPress Copyscape Premium plugin <= 1.4.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Copyscape Copyscape Premium copyscape-premium allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Copyscape Premium: from n/a through <= 1.4.1.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24966 is a medium-severity CSRF issue in the WordPress Copyscape Premium plugin through version 1.4.1. An attacker could trick a user into performing an unintended plugin-related action. The public record indicates limited integrity impact, with no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a routine but time-sensitive WordPress plugin issue. Prioritize sites where Copyscape Premium is installed and administrators regularly use the WordPress dashboard. Business risk appears limited, but unresolved CSRF can allow unwanted configuration or workflow changes.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in the copyscape-premium WordPress plugin, affecting Copyscape Premium through <=1.4.1. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network-accessible, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, low integrity impact. The sources do not identify the vulnerable endpoint or a fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with Copyscape Premium plugin version 1.4.1 or earlier installed and active. Sites not using this plugin are not indicated as affected. The provided sources do not name a patched release.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV, and the supplied sources do not state active exploitation. CSRF generally requires a targeted user interaction, often while the victim has an active WordPress session. The record does not specify the exact action that can be forged.

Researcher notes

Public details are sparse. The available record establishes CSRF, affected range, CVSS, and Patchstack attribution, but not endpoint, nonce behavior, exploit status, or fix version. Avoid assuming impact beyond low integrity until vendor or researcher details are published.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the copyscape-premium plugin.
  • Check installed plugin versions against the <=1.4.1 affected range.
  • Review Copyscape and Patchstack guidance for updates or mitigations.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Limit administrative WordPress access to trusted users pending vendor guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Copyscape Premium is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it to <=1.4.1.
  • Check vendor and Patchstack pages for any newly published fixed version.
  • Review recent WordPress admin activity for unexpected plugin setting changes.
  • Confirm compensating controls are documented if no update is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24966 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-24966Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CopyscapeCopyscape Premiumcopyscape-premium, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.