CVE-2026-2492: TensorFlow HDF5 Library Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
TensorFlow HDF5 Library Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of TensorFlow. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the handling of plugins. The application loads plugins from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of a target user. Was ZDI-CAN-25480.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-2492 is a local privilege escalation issue in TensorFlow 2.17.0 involving HDF5 plugin loading. A user who already has low-privileged code execution on a machine may cause TensorFlow to load code from an unsafe location, gaining the privileges of another target user.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation on shared or production ML systems because this can turn existing local access into higher-privileged code execution. It is less urgent for isolated single-user environments, but still warrants normal high-severity patch handling.
Technical view
The flaw is CWE-427: uncontrolled search path element. TensorFlow’s HDF5 plugin handling can load plugins from an unsecured location. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant on systems running TensorFlow 2.17.0 where local users, jobs, notebooks, or services can execute code and TensorFlow/HDF5 plugin loading is reachable. Shared ML workstations, CI runners, research clusters, and multi-user servers deserve priority review.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires prior low-privileged local code execution. The issue is serious because it can convert limited local access into arbitrary code execution as a more privileged target user.
Researcher notes
The public bundle identifies TensorFlow 2.17.0, CWE-427, ZDI-CAN-25480, and a TensorFlow commit, but does not provide exploit details, broad version ranges, or a clear fixed release in the supplied text. Avoid assuming exposure beyond the cited product and version.
Mitigation direction
Inventory systems and environments running TensorFlow 2.17.0.
Apply TensorFlow or distribution updates referenced by vendor guidance.
Review Red Hat errata applicability for packaged TensorFlow deployments.
Restrict untrusted local code execution on shared ML systems.
Harden permissions around plugin-related writable locations.
Monitor vendor advisories for exact fixed-version guidance.
Validation and detection
Confirm TensorFlow versions in hosts, containers, notebooks, and CI images.
Identify shared systems where low-privileged users can run TensorFlow workloads.
Review whether HDF5 plugin loading is enabled or reachable.
Check local write permissions around plugin-related directories.
Verify vendor fixes or downstream errata are installed.
Document systems where source evidence is insufficient or not applicable.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-427: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
7Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-427 · source CWE mapping
Uncontrolled Search Path Element
Uncontrolled Search Path Element represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.