LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24835: Podman Desktop Extension System Vulnerable to Authentication Bypass

Podman Desktop is a graphical tool for developing on containers and Kubernetes. A critical authentication bypass vulnerability in Podman Desktop prior to version 1.25.1 allows any extension to completely circumvent permission checks and gain unauthorized access to all authentication sessions. The `isAccessAllowed()` function unconditionally returns `true`, enabling malicious extensions to impersonate any user, hijack authentication sessions, and access sensitive resources without authorization. This vulnerability affects all versions of Podman Desktop. Version 1.25.1 contains a patch for the issue.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Podman Desktop before 1.25.1 has a serious permission-check failure in its extension system. A malicious extension could bypass authorization and access authentication sessions, potentially impersonating users and reaching sensitive resources. This mainly matters where Podman Desktop is used on developer workstations with trusted cloud, registry, or Kubernetes credentials.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority developer workstation issue. The business risk is credential and session misuse through extensions, not broad unauthenticated server compromise. Prioritize teams using Podman Desktop with production-adjacent registry, cloud, or Kubernetes access.

Technical view

The vulnerability is an authentication bypass in Podman Desktop extensions. The reported issue is that isAccessAllowed() unconditionally returns true, allowing extensions to circumvent permission checks and access all authentication sessions. The CVE lists CWE-285 and CVSS 4.0 score 8.8. Versions before 1.25.1 are affected; 1.25.1 contains the patch.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on developer endpoints running Podman Desktop earlier than 1.25.1, especially where users install extensions or store authenticated sessions for registries, cloud services, or Kubernetes environments. The provided sources do not indicate server-side exposure or exploitation in the wild.

Exploitation context

Sources describe exploitation through a malicious or compromised Podman Desktop extension abusing broken authorization checks. No KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation. Practical risk depends on extension installation practices, endpoint controls, and the sensitivity of sessions available inside Podman Desktop.

Researcher notes

The available record attributes the flaw to unconditional authorization approval in the extension access-control path. Avoid assuming exploit availability beyond the described malicious-extension scenario. Validate exposure by version and extension trust boundaries, then assess what authentication sessions were accessible on affected endpoints.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Podman Desktop to version 1.25.1 or later.
  • Restrict installation of unapproved Podman Desktop extensions.
  • Review installed extensions and remove untrusted or unnecessary ones.
  • Rotate credentials if suspicious extension activity is found.
  • Monitor the vendor advisory for updated remediation guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Podman Desktop installations and record versions.
  • Confirm affected systems are upgraded to 1.25.1 or later.
  • List installed extensions on developer workstations.
  • Review endpoint logs for suspicious extension installation or activity.
  • Check whether sensitive sessions were present on affected hosts.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-285: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24835 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-24835Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
podman-desktoppodman-desktop< 1.25.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-285 · source CWE mapping

Improper Authorization

Improper Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.