LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-2479: Responsive Lightbox & Gallery <= 2.7.1 - Authenticated (Author+) Server-Side Request Forgery via Remote Library Image Upload

The Responsive Lightbox & Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.1. This is due to the use of `strpos()` for substring-based hostname validation instead of strict host comparison in the `ajax_upload_image()` function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and modify information from internal services.

MediumCVSS 5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-2479 affects the Responsive Lightbox & Gallery WordPress plugin through version 2.7.1. A logged-in user with Author-level access or higher could cause the website server to make requests to arbitrary locations. The main business concern is exposure of internal services reachable from the web server, not direct unauthenticated takeover.

Executive priority

Handle in normal vulnerability remediation cycles, faster for sites with many content contributors or sensitive internal network access. This is not currently evidenced as exploited, but it can turn a compromised author account into internal network probing from the server.

Technical view

The flaw is an authenticated SSRF in ajax_upload_image() within the remote library image upload flow. Sources attribute it to substring-based hostname validation using strpos() instead of strict host comparison. CVSS is 5.0, with network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites running Responsive Lightbox & Gallery versions up to and including 2.7.1 are potentially exposed if untrusted or compromised accounts have Author-level or higher privileges.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires authenticated Author-or-higher access, limiting broad drive-by risk. Impact depends on what internal endpoints or metadata services the WordPress server can reach.

Researcher notes

Focus review on ajax_upload_image() and hostname validation in class-remote-library.php. Compare affected tag code with trunk and changeset 3464566. Avoid assuming unauthenticated impact; the provided record states Author-level authentication is required.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites using Responsive Lightbox & Gallery.
  • Upgrade beyond affected versions if a fixed vendor release is available.
  • If no fix is available, follow vendor guidance and restrict plugin use.
  • Limit Author-level access to trusted users only.
  • Restrict server egress to internal services where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed plugin version across WordPress assets.
  • Confirm whether any site runs version 2.7.1 or earlier.
  • Review user roles for Author-level or higher access.
  • Review web server egress paths to internal services.
  • Monitor logs for unusual remote library image upload requests.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-2479 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N3.11.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-2479Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
dfactoryResponsive Lightbox & Gallery0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.