LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24785: Clatter has a PSK Validity Rule Violation issue

Clatter is a no_std compatible, pure Rust implementation of the Noise protocol framework with post-quantum support. Versiosn prior to2.2.0 have a protocol compliance vulnerability. The library allowed post-quantum handshake patterns that violated the PSK validity rule (Noise Protocol Framework Section 9.3). This could allow PSK-derived keys to be used for encryption without proper randomization by self-chosen ephemeral randomness, weakening security guarantees and potentially allowing catastrophic key reuse. Affected default patterns include `noise_pqkk_psk0`, `noise_pqkn_psk0`, `noise_pqnk_psk0`, `noise_pqnn_psk0``, and some hybrid variants. Users of these patterns may have been using handshakes that do not meet the intended security properties. The issue is fully patched and released in Clatter v2.2.0. The fixed version includes runtime checks to detect offending handshake patterns. As a workaround, avoid using offending `*_psk0` variants of post-quantum patterns. Review custom handshake patterns carefully.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24785 affects Clatter, a Rust Noise protocol library. Versions before 2.2.0 allowed certain post-quantum pre-shared-key handshake patterns that break Noise’s PSK validity rule. This can weaken encryption guarantees and may risk catastrophic key reuse in affected designs. The vendor reports the issue is fixed in Clatter 2.2.0.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation where Clatter protects sensitive or long-lived communications, especially in products using post-quantum PSK handshakes. Treat as high priority for affected deployments because cryptographic design failures can undermine confidentiality and integrity without obvious operational symptoms.

Technical view

Clatter before 2.2.0 permitted PQ and hybrid `*_psk0` handshake patterns that violated Noise Framework Section 9.3. PSK-derived keys could be used for encryption without proper randomization from self-chosen ephemeral randomness. Affected defaults include `noise_pqkk_psk0`, `noise_pqkn_psk0`, `noise_pqnk_psk0`, and `noise_pqnn_psk0`. CWE-327 applies.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to applications or embedded systems using the jmlepisto Clatter Rust crate before 2.2.0, especially with the named post-quantum `*_psk0` patterns or similar custom hybrid patterns. Systems not using Clatter, not using affected PSK0 PQ patterns, or already on 2.2.0 are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

No source provided states active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. This is a cryptographic protocol compliance flaw, not a typical remote code execution issue. Business impact depends on whether affected handshakes protect sensitive communications and whether keys or sessions could be reused under weakened guarantees.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the GitHub advisory and referenced patch. The issue centers on Noise Section 9.3 PSK validity, with Clatter 2.2.0 adding runtime detection for offending patterns. Public evidence in the bundle does not show exploitation, affected downstream products, or practical attack demonstrations.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Clatter to version 2.2.0 or later.
  • Avoid offending post-quantum `*_psk0` handshake variants.
  • Review custom handshake patterns against the Noise PSK validity rule.
  • Follow the GitHub advisory for any additional vendor guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Rust projects and firmware for Clatter dependency versions.
  • Identify use of `noise_pqkk_psk0`, `noise_pqkn_psk0`, `noise_pqnk_psk0`, or `noise_pqnn_psk0`.
  • Review custom PQ or hybrid PSK patterns for validity-rule compliance.
  • Confirm Clatter 2.2.0 runtime checks are present after upgrade.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-327: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24785 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-24785Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
jmlepistoclatter< 2.2.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-327 · source CWE mapping

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.