Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat.
When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114.
The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are
known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected.
Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue.
Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-24734 is a high-severity certificate validation flaw in Apache Tomcat Native and Tomcat. In OCSP-based revocation checking, affected versions could accept insufficiently verified or stale OCSP responses, allowing a revoked certificate to be treated as valid.
Executive priority
Treat this as a priority patch for certificate-sensitive Tomcat services. It is not cited as actively exploited, but it can weaken authentication and encrypted trust decisions where OCSP revocation checking is relied upon.
Technical view
Affected Tomcat Native and Tomcat FFM native code did not fully verify OCSP response validity or freshness. The issue maps to CWE-20 and CWE-295, has CVSS 7.4, and impacts confidentiality and integrity without requiring authentication or user interaction, though attack complexity is high.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where affected Tomcat or Tomcat Native versions use an OCSP responder for certificate revocation checking, especially internet-facing TLS or mTLS services that rely on revocation decisions.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show KEV listing, active exploitation, or public exploit details. The business concern is trust bypass: revoked certificates may not be rejected in affected OCSP validation paths.
Researcher notes
Affected ranges are explicit: Tomcat Native 1.3.0-1.3.4 and 2.0.0-2.0.11; Tomcat 11.0.0-M1-11.0.17, 10.1.0-M7-10.1.51, and 9.0.83-9.0.114. Some EOL Native 1.1.x and 1.2.x releases are also affected.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Tomcat Native to 1.3.5 or later, or 2.0.12 or later.
Upgrade Tomcat to 11.0.18, 10.1.52, or 9.0.115 or later.
Replace affected EOL Tomcat Native 1.1.x or 1.2.x deployments with supported fixed versions.
For Red Hat-packaged deployments, follow the referenced Red Hat errata and product guidance.
Prioritize systems using OCSP, client certificates, or certificate-based service authentication.
Validation and detection
Inventory Tomcat and Tomcat Native versions across production, staging, and container images.
Confirm whether OCSP responder-based revocation checking is configured or required.
Verify fixed upstream versions or vendor-backported package versions are installed.
Review Red Hat CVE, VEX, and errata records for downstream product applicability.
Document any EOL Tomcat Native installations and migration ownership.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-20 · source CWE mapping
Improper Input Validation
Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.