LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24695: Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into OpenSSL argument fields within requests sent to the utility route, leading to remote code execution.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24695 is a command injection flaw in Copeland XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior. A highly privileged authenticated user could trigger remote code execution through malicious OpenSSL argument input. Business urgency is highest where XWEB Pro is reachable over operational networks or remotely administered.

Executive priority

Prioritize validation in operational technology environments. Treat confirmed affected systems as high priority because the impact is remote code execution, even though exploitation requires privileged authentication and no active exploitation is cited.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-78 OS command injection in requests to a utility route. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.0, with network access, high attack complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations running Copeland XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 or earlier are the indicated exposure. Source product/version metadata is incomplete and somewhat inconsistent, so teams should confirm exact models and firmware/software versions against Copeland and CISA guidance.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires authenticated high-privilege access and specific malicious input, but successful exploitation could give remote code execution on the affected system.

Researcher notes

The description names XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior. The bundled affected-product records list several XWEB PRO models with version value “0” and defaultStatus “unaffected,” so product matching should be verified directly from CISA CSAF and Copeland sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Copeland System Software Update guidance for fixed software or firmware availability.
  • Review CISA ICSA-26-057-10 for vendor-recommended mitigations and affected product details.
  • Restrict XWEB administrative access to trusted management networks and users.
  • Remove direct internet exposure where present.
  • Audit privileged accounts and disable unused or shared accounts.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro deployments.
  • Confirm whether any systems run XWEB Pro 1.12.1 or earlier.
  • Compare appliance models and versions against Copeland and CISA advisory data.
  • Review access controls for the utility route and administrative interfaces.
  • Check logs for unusual authenticated utility-route requests.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24695 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-24695Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CopelandCopeland XWEB 300D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500B PRO0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.