LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24689: Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update apply action.

HighCVSS 8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24689 is a high-severity flaw in Copeland XWEB Pro that could let a logged-in attacker run operating-system commands during a firmware update action. This can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the device. The public bundle does not show known active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a priority for environments using Copeland XWEB Pro, especially operational technology sites. The flaw requires privileged access, but impact is high if abused. Assign ownership to validate affected versions and apply vendor guidance; do not assume exposure is resolved because the public affected-product metadata appears inconsistent.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-78 OS command injection in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior. An authenticated attacker with high privileges can inject malicious input into the firmware update apply action’s devices field, leading to remote code execution. CVSS v3.1 is 8.0 with network attack vector, high complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, and scope changed.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Copeland XWEB Pro management interfaces are reachable by users with administrative or similar access. The affected-product data in the bundle is inconsistent: the description names XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior, while listed product entries show version “0” and default status “unaffected.” Validate against vendor and CISA records.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is stated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked CISA KEV. Exploitation requires authentication and high privileges, which lowers likelihood versus unauthenticated flaws, but successful exploitation could provide remote code execution on the system.

Researcher notes

Public details identify the vulnerable parameter and action but provide limited affected-version clarity beyond “XWEB Pro 1.12.1 and prior.” Avoid relying solely on the affected list in the bundle because it appears contradictory. No exploit availability or in-the-wild exploitation is supported by the supplied sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Copeland’s System Software Update page for applicable XWEB Pro updates.
  • Review CISA advisory ICSA-26-057-10 for vendor-recommended mitigations.
  • Restrict XWEB Pro management access to trusted administrators and networks.
  • Audit and minimize privileged accounts able to perform firmware update actions.
  • Monitor vendor and CISA pages for corrected affected-version details.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Copeland XWEB Pro deployments and record software versions.
  • Confirm whether any systems run XWEB Pro 1.12.1 or prior.
  • Verify management interfaces are not broadly network-accessible.
  • Review logs for firmware update apply activity by privileged users.
  • Compare local product models against Copeland and CISA advisory data.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24689 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-24689Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CopelandCopeland XWEB 300D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500D PRO0unaffected
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500B PRO0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.