LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24480: QGIS had validated RCE and Repository Takeover via GitHub Actions

QGIS is a free, open source, cross platform geographical information system (GIS) The repository contains a GitHub Actions workflow called "pre-commit checks" that, before commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9, was vulnerable to remote code execution and repository compromise because it used the `pull_request_target` trigger and then checked out and executed untrusted pull request code in a privileged context. Workflows triggered by `pull_request_target` ran with the base repository's credentials and access to secrets. If these workflows then checked out and executed code from the head of an external pull request (which could have been attacker controlled), the attacker could have executed arbitrary commands with elevated privileges. This insecure pattern has been documented as a security risk by GitHub and security researchers. Commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9 removed the vulnerable code.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24480 is a high-severity GitHub Actions workflow flaw in the QGIS repository. A workflow used privileged credentials while running code from untrusted pull requests, creating potential repository takeover risk. This affects the project’s source repository workflow, not ordinary QGIS desktop use based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for teams that maintain QGIS source, forks, or CI/CD workflows. The business risk is unauthorized code execution in trusted automation and possible repository compromise. For normal QGIS application users, the provided evidence does not show a direct workstation exploitation path.

Technical view

Before commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9, QGIS used a `pull_request_target` workflow that checked out and executed external pull request code in a privileged context. GitHub Actions secrets and base-repository credentials could be exposed or abused. The issue is classified as CWE-863 with CVSS 4.0 score 8.7.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to QGIS repository maintainers and organizations mirroring or reusing the vulnerable workflow pattern. The provided sources identify QGIS versions before commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9 as affected. No evidence is provided that installed QGIS end-user software is directly exploitable.

Exploitation context

The flaw requires an attacker to submit or influence an external pull request that causes privileged automation to run attacker-controlled code. The source bundle states the RCE/repository compromise path was validated. There is no KEV listing and no provided source states active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

This is a CI/CD trust-boundary issue rather than a conventional application runtime bug. The key pattern is privileged `pull_request_target` execution of untrusted pull request code. Sources name the fixing commit but do not provide broader incident details or evidence of active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply or verify commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9 in the QGIS repository.
  • Review GitHub Actions workflows using `pull_request_target` for untrusted code execution.
  • Avoid checking out and running external pull request code with privileged repository tokens.
  • Limit workflow token permissions and access to secrets where possible.
  • Check the GitHub advisory for any updated vendor guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the repository includes commit 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9 or later.
  • Inspect workflows for `pull_request_target` combined with external PR checkout and execution.
  • Review recent workflow runs from external pull requests for suspicious activity.
  • Verify workflow permissions follow least privilege and secrets are not available unnecessarily.
  • Check whether downstream forks copied the vulnerable workflow.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24480 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-24480Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
qgisQGIS< 76a693cd91650f9b4e83edac525e5e4f90d954e9Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.