LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24434: Tenda AC7 Web Interface Lacks CSRF Protections for Admin Actions

Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.

MediumCVSS 5.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects Tenda AC7 router administration pages. A logged-in administrator could be tricked into changing router settings without intending to, because the interface lacks CSRF protections. The business risk is configuration tampering, not confirmed data theft or service outage based on the supplied CVSS data.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority router hardening issue. It deserves timely inventory and remediation tracking, especially where router configuration integrity is operationally important, but current sources do not support emergency response.

Technical view

Tenda AC7 firmware V03.03.03.01_cn and prior lacks anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation for administrative web actions. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, active user interaction required, and low integrity impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations or users operating Tenda AC7 routers with affected firmware and administrators who access the web management interface while authenticated.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires administrator interaction, such as inducing a logged-in admin to trigger unintended state-changing requests.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports CWE-352 CSRF in administrative functions with low integrity impact. The affected-version metadata is inconsistent in the bundle, listing version "0" while the description states V03.03.03.01_cn and prior; validate against vendor or advisory updates.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Tenda guidance for firmware updates or official mitigations.
  • Inventory Tenda AC7 devices and identify affected firmware versions.
  • Restrict web management access to trusted administration networks.
  • Avoid administering affected routers during general web browsing sessions.
  • Monitor the CVE and advisory pages for updated remediation information.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any deployed devices are Tenda AC7 routers.
  • Record firmware versions and compare against V03.03.03.01_cn and prior.
  • Review administrative interface exposure and access controls.
  • Check whether current firmware release notes mention CSRF protections.
  • Document compensating controls until vendor remediation is confirmed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24434 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-24434Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd.Tenda AC70unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.