CVE-2026-24434: Tenda AC7 Web Interface Lacks CSRF Protections for Admin Actions
Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This CVE affects Tenda AC7 router administration pages. A logged-in administrator could be tricked into changing router settings without intending to, because the interface lacks CSRF protections. The business risk is configuration tampering, not confirmed data theft or service outage based on the supplied CVSS data.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate-priority router hardening issue. It deserves timely inventory and remediation tracking, especially where router configuration integrity is operationally important, but current sources do not support emergency response.
Technical view
Tenda AC7 firmware V03.03.03.01_cn and prior lacks anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation for administrative web actions. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, active user interaction required, and low integrity impact only.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations or users operating Tenda AC7 routers with affected firmware and administrators who access the web management interface while authenticated.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires administrator interaction, such as inducing a logged-in admin to trigger unintended state-changing requests.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports CWE-352 CSRF in administrative functions with low integrity impact. The affected-version metadata is inconsistent in the bundle, listing version "0" while the description states V03.03.03.01_cn and prior; validate against vendor or advisory updates.
Mitigation direction
Check Tenda guidance for firmware updates or official mitigations.
Inventory Tenda AC7 devices and identify affected firmware versions.
Restrict web management access to trusted administration networks.
Avoid administering affected routers during general web browsing sessions.
Monitor the CVE and advisory pages for updated remediation information.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether any deployed devices are Tenda AC7 routers.
Record firmware versions and compare against V03.03.03.01_cn and prior.
Review administrative interface exposure and access controls.
Check whether current firmware release notes mention CSRF protections.
Document compensating controls until vendor remediation is confirmed.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.