LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24137: sigstore legacy TUF client allows for arbitrary file writes with target cache path traversal

sigstore framework is a common go library shared across sigstore services and clients. In versions 1.10.3 and below, the legacy TUF client (pkg/tuf/client.go) supports caching target files to disk. It constructs a filesystem path by joining a cache base directory with a target name sourced from signed target metadata; however, it does not validate that the resulting path stays within the cache base directory. A malicious TUF repository can trigger arbitrary file overwriting, limited to the permissions that the calling process has. Note that this should only affect clients that are directly using the TUF client in sigstore/sigstore or are using an older version of Cosign. Public Sigstore deployment users are unaffected, as TUF metadata is validated by a quorum of trusted collaborators. This issue has been fixed in version 1.10.4. As a workaround, users can disable disk caching for the legacy client by setting SIGSTORE_NO_CACHE=true in the environment, migrate to https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/tree/main/pkg/tuf, or upgrade to the latest sigstore/sigstore release.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-24137 affects sigstore’s legacy TUF client. A malicious TUF repository could cause files to be written outside the intended cache directory, limited by the permissions of the running process. Public Sigstore deployment users are stated to be unaffected. The issue is fixed in sigstore 1.10.4.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted integrity risk, not a broad emergency. Prioritize developer tooling, CI/CD, and signing-verification environments that use old sigstore or Cosign components, especially where processes have write access to sensitive paths.

Technical view

In sigstore versions 1.10.3 and below, pkg/tuf/client.go joins a cache base directory with a target name from signed TUF metadata without ensuring the final path remains inside the cache. This CWE-22 path traversal can overwrite arbitrary files when the legacy client caches targets to disk.

Likely exposure

Exposure is mainly clients directly using sigstore/sigstore’s legacy TUF client or older Cosign versions. Systems using public Sigstore deployment metadata are described as unaffected because metadata is validated by a quorum of trusted collaborators.

Exploitation context

The source states exploitation requires a malicious TUF repository and file overwrite is limited to the calling process’s permissions. CVSS indicates network reachability, high attack complexity, high privileges, no user interaction, and high integrity impact. No active exploitation is reported in the provided sources.

Researcher notes

The advisory’s scope is narrow: legacy sigstore TUF client caching target files. The key control is path containment during cache writes. Public Sigstore deployments are excluded by the source. Evidence does not include proof of exploitation, affected Cosign version ranges, or detailed downstream package mapping.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade sigstore/sigstore to version 1.10.4 or later.
  • Set SIGSTORE_NO_CACHE=true to disable disk caching for the legacy client.
  • Migrate to the sigstore-go TUF client referenced by the advisory.
  • Check Sigstore and Cosign guidance for older Cosign exposure and upgrade direction.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications and tools importing sigstore/sigstore legacy TUF client code.
  • Confirm sigstore/sigstore dependency versions are 1.10.4 or later.
  • Identify older Cosign usage and compare against vendor guidance.
  • Verify whether legacy TUF disk caching is enabled in affected environments.
  • Confirm workloads do not use untrusted or private maliciously controlled TUF repositories.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24137 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N1.34Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-24137Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
sigstoresigstore< 1.10.4Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.