LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-24129: Runtipi is Vulnerable to Authenticated Arbitrary Remote Code Execution

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Runtipi versions 3.7.0 through before 4.7.0 have a high-severity flaw in backup handling. An authenticated user can craft an uploaded backup filename so that, during restore, the host may execute unintended system commands. This affects the server running Runtipi, not just an individual app container. Version 4.7.0 fixes the issue.

Executive priority

Treat as a near-term remediation item for any Runtipi server with multiple administrators or remote management exposure. Prioritize upgrade to 4.7.0 because compromise could reach the host server. Urgency is reduced if access is tightly restricted and no untrusted users can manage backups.

Technical view

CVE-2026-24129 is a CWE-78 command injection in Runtipi BackupManager. User-uploaded backup files were persisted using the raw original filename, allowing shell metacharacters in filenames to be later referenced by restore logic and interpreted as commands. CVSS 3.1 is 8.1, with network attack vector, high complexity, high privileges required, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Runtipi deployments running versions >=3.7.0 and <4.7.0 where an attacker can authenticate with sufficient access to upload or restore backups. Internet exposure increases business risk, but the source indicates high privileges and high attack complexity are required.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided data, and no cited source states active exploitation. The issue requires authenticated access and a backup/restore workflow. Successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host system.

Researcher notes

The advisory attributes the root cause to unsanitized original filenames saved to the host filesystem and later consumed by restore command construction. The provided sources identify the affected range and fix version but do not provide evidence of exploitation in the wild. Avoid testing with live exploit patterns outside authorized lab environments.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Runtipi to version 4.7.0 or later.
  • Restrict Runtipi administrative access to trusted users only.
  • Limit network exposure of Runtipi management interfaces.
  • Review vendor advisory and release notes before applying changes.
  • If immediate upgrade is impossible, check vendor guidance for supported temporary mitigations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Runtipi instances and record installed versions.
  • Confirm no instance runs versions 3.7.0 through 4.6.x.
  • Verify upgrade completion to version 4.7.0 or later.
  • Review backup upload and restore access permissions.
  • Check logs for suspicious backup filenames or restore activity.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-24129 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-24129Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
runtipiruntipi>= 3.7.0, < 4.7.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.