Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This WordPress plugin flaw lets an attacker change a plugin setting if they can trick a logged-in site administrator into clicking a crafted link or taking a similar action. The reported impact is limited to adding URLs to a blocked redirects list, not full site takeover.
Executive priority
Treat as a routine but timely WordPress plugin fix. Prioritize sites with many administrators or high exposure to phishing. This is not currently evidenced as mass-exploited or critical, but it can allow unauthorized configuration changes.
Technical view
CVE-2026-2410 is a CSRF vulnerability in Disable Admin Notices – Hide Dashboard Notifications through version 1.4.2. Missing nonce validation in showPageContent() allows unauthenticated attackers to submit a forged request that updates the blocked redirects list, requiring administrator interaction. CVSS is 4.3, CWE-352.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Disable Admin Notices – Hide Dashboard Notifications version 1.4.2 or earlier. The attack depends on an authenticated administrator being induced to interact with attacker-controlled content.
Exploitation context
No CISA KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction by a site administrator. The documented impact is integrity-only and limited to plugin settings, though unwanted redirect blocking can affect administrator workflows.
Researcher notes
The CVE description and Wordfence identify CSRF caused by missing nonce validation. WordPress Trac references show the relevant file and a changeset, but the provided sources do not clearly name a fixed release version. Avoid assuming exploitation or broader impact.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for this plugin and versions up to 1.4.2.
- Check the vendor or WordPress plugin repository for a release addressing this issue.
- Update the plugin if a fixed version is available from the official source.
- Temporarily disable the plugin where risk outweighs its operational value.
- Warn administrators against clicking unsolicited links while logged into WordPress.
Validation and detection
- Confirm installed plugin version on each WordPress site.
- Review plugin code for nonce validation in showPageContent().
- Check the blocked redirects list for unexpected or unauthorized URLs.
- Review WordPress admin activity around plugin settings changes.
- Track the referenced WordPress Trac changeset for remediation context.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-2410 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 4.3 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
4.3MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/b3011679-51e8-4a13-8364-1d0723656d08?source=cveCVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/disable-admin-notices/tags/1.4.2/admin/pages/class-pages-edit-redirects.php#L103CVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/disable-admin-notices/trunk/admin/pages/class-pages-edit-redirects.php#L103CVE reference
- https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3463239/disable-admin-notices/trunk/admin/pages/class-pages-edit-redirects.phpCVE reference
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.