LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23991: go-tuf affected by client DoS via malformed server response

go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.3.1, if the TUF repository (or any of its mirrors) returns invalid TUF metadata JSON (valid JSON but not well formed TUF metadata), the client will panic during parsing, causing a denial of service. The panic happens before any signature is validated. This means that a compromised repository/mirror/cache can DoS clients without having access to any signing key. Version 2.3.1 fixes the issue. No known workarounds are available.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-23991 can make applications using go-tuf crash when they receive malformed TUF metadata from a repository, mirror, or cache. It does not allow data theft or code execution based on current sources, but it can interrupt update workflows. The issue affects go-tuf versions 2.0.0 through before 2.3.1 and is fixed in 2.3.1.

Executive priority

Treat as a timely maintenance fix, especially for products where update availability is business-critical. It is not currently evidenced as exploited or code-execution capable, but a compromised mirror or cache could disrupt client update operations.

Technical view

go-tuf clients panic while parsing valid JSON that is not well-formed TUF metadata. The panic occurs before signature validation, so a compromised repository, mirror, or cache can cause client denial of service without signing keys. CVSS is 5.9, with network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to software that embeds or depends on theupdateframework/go-tuf versions >=2.0.0 and <2.3.1. Systems that fetch TUF metadata through mirrors, caches, or repositories outside direct control have the clearest operational risk.

Exploitation context

The source advisory describes a denial-of-service condition from malformed server responses. The CVE is not in KEV, and the provided sources do not report active exploitation. Exploitation requires influence over a repository, mirror, cache, or equivalent metadata response path.

Researcher notes

Key nuance: signature validation does not protect against this crash because parsing fails first. The vulnerability maps to CWE-617 and CWE-754. Public sources identify the fixing release and commit, but do not provide evidence of exploitation or workaround options.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade go-tuf to version 2.3.1 or later.
  • Identify applications and services that embed vulnerable go-tuf versions.
  • Review use of third-party mirrors, caches, or repositories in update paths.
  • If immediate upgrade is not possible, check vendor guidance; sources list no workaround.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Go dependencies for theupdateframework/go-tuf versions >=2.0.0 and <2.3.1.
  • Confirm production builds use go-tuf 2.3.1 or later.
  • Map TUF metadata sources, mirrors, and caches used by affected clients.
  • Monitor affected clients for unexpected panics or update-service availability failures.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-617: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-754: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23991 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.23.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-23991Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
theupdateframeworkgo-tuf>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-617 · source CWE mapping

Reachable Assertion

Reachable Assertion represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-754 · source CWE mapping

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.