LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23943: Pre-auth SSH DoS via unbounded zlib inflate

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Compression Bomb) vulnerability in Erlang OTP ssh (ssh_transport modules) allows Denial of Service via Resource Depletion. The SSH transport layer advertises legacy zlib compression by default and inflates attacker-controlled payloads pre-authentication without any size limit, enabling reliable memory exhaustion DoS. Two compression algorithms are affected: * zlib: Activates immediately after key exchange, enabling unauthenticated attacks * zlib@openssh.com: Activates post-authentication, enabling authenticated attacks Each SSH packet can decompress ~255 MB from 256 KB of wire data (1029:1 amplification ratio). Multiple packets can rapidly exhaust available memory, causing OOM kills in memory-constrained environments. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/ssh/src/ssh_transport.erl and program routines ssh_transport:decompress/2, ssh_transport:handle_packet_part/4. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 28.4.1, OTP 27.3.4.9 and OTP 26.2.5.18, corresponding to ssh from 3.0.1 before 5.5.1, 5.2.11.6 and 5.1.4.14.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Erlang/OTP’s SSH service can expand small compressed network packets into very large memory allocations. With legacy zlib compression, a remote attacker can trigger this before authentication, potentially exhausting memory, terminating the service, or causing system-level out-of-memory kills. The issue affects a broad range of OTP releases beginning with OTP 17.0.

Executive priority

Prioritize internet-facing or broadly reachable Erlang SSH services, especially on memory-limited infrastructure. Although rated medium with CVSS 4.0 score 6.9, pre-authentication resource exhaustion can interrupt availability. Patch exposed systems promptly; handle isolated or non-SSH deployments through normal risk-based maintenance after confirming exposure.

Technical view

The SSH transport decompresses attacker-controlled data without an output-size limit. A 256 KB packet may inflate to approximately 255 MB, a reported 1029:1 ratio. Legacy zlib is exploitable after key exchange but before authentication; zlib@openssh.com requires authentication. Affected logic includes ssh_transport:decompress/2 and ssh_transport:handle_packet_part/4.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where an affected Erlang/OTP SSH listener is reachable from untrusted networks and negotiates legacy zlib compression. Memory-constrained containers, appliances, and hosts may fail rapidly. Applications using Erlang/OTP without its SSH service, or running listed fixed versions, are not shown by the supplied evidence to be exposed.

Exploitation context

The attack requires network access and low complexity, with no privileges or user interaction for legacy zlib. Multiple compressed packets can cause reliable memory exhaustion. The supplied bundle reports no CISA KEV listing and provides no evidence of active exploitation in the wild as of its July 24, 2026 update.

Researcher notes

CWE-409 applies. The vulnerable files and routines are identified, and three upstream patch commits are supplied. The bundle’s affected-version metadata is less clear for obsolete branches; use the vendor advisory and Erlang version-ordering rules when evaluating exact releases. No confidentiality or integrity impact is reported.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OTP 28 to 28.4.1 or later.
  • Upgrade OTP 27 to 27.3.4.9 or later.
  • Upgrade OTP 26 to 26.2.5.18 or later.
  • For other affected branches, follow the Erlang advisory and move to a supported fixed release.
  • Until upgraded, restrict affected SSH listeners to trusted networks and monitor memory pressure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Erlang/OTP and bundled ssh application versions across servers, containers, appliances, and embedded products.
  • Identify whether the Erlang SSH service is enabled and reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Confirm deployed versions meet the applicable fixed-release threshold stated in the vendor advisory.
  • Review telemetry for memory spikes, out-of-memory kills, crashes, or repeated restarts involving Erlang SSH services.
  • Validate remediation through version inspection and safe functional SSH testing without compressed attack traffic.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-409: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23943 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
8Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——EEF

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-23943Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ErlangOTPssh, 3.0.1unknown
ErlangOTPerlang/otp, 17.0, 07b8f441ca711f9812fad9e9115bab3c3aa92f79unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-409 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.