CVE-2026-23868: Giflib contains a double-free vulnerability that is the result of a shallow copy in GifMakeSavedImage and i...
Giflib contains a double-free vulnerability that is the result of a shallow copy in GifMakeSavedImage and incorrect error handling. The conditions needed to trigger this vulnerability are difficult but may be possible.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-23868 is a high-severity memory safety flaw in giflib. A specially handled GIF processing path could cause a double-free, potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The sources say triggering it is difficult but possible.
Executive priority
Treat as a normal high-priority patching item for systems that process untrusted images. It does not currently have KEV-backed exploitation evidence, but memory corruption in a common image library warrants timely remediation.
Technical view
giflib 5.0.0 is affected by a double-free caused by a shallow copy in GifMakeSavedImage and incorrect error handling. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.0 with local attack vector, high complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where giflib 5.0.0, or downstream packages containing it, processes untrusted GIF files. Red Hat references and errata indicate downstream tracking, but the bundle does not enumerate every affected platform or package version.
Exploitation context
The provided bundle marks KEV as false and gives no cited evidence of active exploitation. The stated attack conditions are difficult, and the CVSS vector requires local context and user interaction.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on the GifMakeSavedImage shallow-copy path and downstream error handling. Avoid assuming remote exploitability from the CVSS vector; the provided score is local, high-complexity, and user-assisted.
Mitigation direction
Check vendor advisories for giflib package status and fixed versions.
Apply relevant Red Hat security updates where affected packages are installed.
Update bundled or statically linked giflib copies in applications.
Limit processing of untrusted GIF files until vendor guidance is applied.
Track upstream giflib and distribution advisories for corrected releases.
Validation and detection
Inventory systems and applications using giflib 5.0.0.
Check OS package advisories against installed giflib package versions.
Review software bills of materials for bundled giflib copies.
Confirm Red Hat errata applicability for subscribed systems.
Retest GIF-processing workflows after updates are applied.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
Expired Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.