LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23750: Golioth Pouch (prior to commit 1b2219a1) BLE GATT Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Golioth Pouch version 0.1.0, prior to commit 1b2219a1, contains a heap-based buffer overflow in BLE GATT server certificate handling. server_cert_write() allocates a heap buffer of size CONFIG_POUCH_SERVER_CERT_MAX_LEN when receiving the first fragment, then appends subsequent fragments using memcpy() without verifying that sufficient capacity remains. An adjacent BLE client can send unauthenticated fragments whose combined size exceeds the allocated buffer, causing a heap overflow and crash; integrity impact is also possible due to memory corruption.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-23750 is a high-severity flaw in Golioth Pouch BLE certificate handling. A nearby attacker can send unauthenticated Bluetooth fragments that exceed an allocated heap buffer, causing device crashes and possible memory corruption. The business risk is highest for deployed devices using Pouch 0.1.0 or code before the fixing commit.

Executive priority

Treat as a priority fix for affected BLE-enabled device fleets. The attack requires proximity, but no credentials or user action, and successful exploitation can crash devices or corrupt memory.

Technical view

server_cert_write() allocates CONFIG_POUCH_SERVER_CERT_MAX_LEN for the first certificate fragment, then copies later fragments without checking remaining capacity. Overlong combined BLE GATT writes can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. CVSS 8.1 reflects adjacent attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, high integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to products or firmware using Golioth Pouch 0.1.0 or code before commit 1b2219a1, with the affected BLE GATT server certificate path enabled and reachable by adjacent BLE clients.

Exploitation context

Sources describe unauthenticated adjacent BLE exploitation and public technical details. The bundle marks KEV as false, so there is no provided evidence of known active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Key validation points are dependency version, presence of server_cert_write(), CONFIG_POUCH_SERVER_CERT_MAX_LEN handling, and whether cumulative fragment length is bounded before memcpy(). Do not infer internet exposure; the CVSS vector is adjacent network.

Mitigation direction

  • Update Golioth Pouch to include commit 1b2219a1 or a later vendor-fixed version.
  • Rebuild and redeploy affected firmware images after confirming the patched dependency is included.
  • Restrict BLE access during remediation where operationally feasible.
  • Check Golioth guidance for any additional fixed releases or configuration advice.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory firmware builds for Golioth Pouch 0.1.0 or pre-1b2219a1 source.
  • Confirm deployed images contain the 1b2219a1 fix or later equivalent changes.
  • Verify the affected BLE GATT certificate handling feature is disabled or patched.
  • Run defensive regression tests for certificate fragment length handling in an isolated lab.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23750 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H2.85.2VulnCheck
7.2CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.2High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-23750Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GoliothPouch0.1.0, 1b2219a159bcbef3f37caa303bbf14d14e979c11unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.