LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23732: FreeRDP has heap-buffer-overflow in Glyph_Alloc

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.21.0, FastGlyph parsing trusts `cbData`/remaining length and never validates against the minimum size implied by `cx/cy`. A malicious server can trigger a client‑side global buffer overflow, causing a crash (DoS). Version 3.21.0 contains a patch for the issue.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-23732 affects FreeRDP clients before 3.21.0. A malicious RDP server can send malformed FastGlyph data that crashes the client. The documented impact is denial of service, not data theft or remote code execution. Organizations using FreeRDP for remote desktop access should prioritize updating affected clients.

Executive priority

Medium priority. This is a client-crash vulnerability with a published fixed version. Prioritize remediation where FreeRDP is used in operational workflows, remote administration, or automated connections to third-party or less-trusted RDP endpoints.

Technical view

FreeRDP FastGlyph parsing trusted cbData and remaining buffer length without validating the minimum size implied by cx/cy. This can cause a heap/global buffer overflow in Glyph_Alloc-related processing when a client handles malicious server data. The CVE lists CWE-122 and CVSS 4.0 score 5.5. Version 3.21.0 includes the patch.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running FreeRDP client versions earlier than 3.21.0, especially where users or automation connect to untrusted, internet-hosted, or potentially compromised RDP servers.

Exploitation context

The source bundle states a malicious server can trigger a client-side crash. CISA KEV status is false in the provided data, and no cited source states active exploitation. Treat this as a practical DoS risk for exposed FreeRDP clients.

Researcher notes

Key evidence is the FreeRDP advisory and referenced source locations in glyph, color, graphics, and orders handling. The provided description limits impact to crash/DoS. Do not assume code execution without additional evidence. Patch availability is stated for 3.21.0.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.21.0 or later.
  • Inventory desktops, jump hosts, and automation using FreeRDP libraries or clients.
  • Limit FreeRDP connections to trusted RDP servers where possible.
  • Check downstream OS or package vendor advisories for backported fixes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed FreeRDP versions are 3.21.0 or later.
  • Review package manager or software inventory data for FreeRDP dependencies.
  • Identify workflows connecting FreeRDP clients to untrusted RDP servers.
  • Verify vendor release notes or advisories are reflected in deployed builds.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23732 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-23732Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FreeRDPFreeRDP< 3.21.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.