LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23622: CSRF Protection Bypass: Sensitive endpoints accept GET requests, enabling admin account takeover

Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In 1.5.2 and earlier, application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() only enforces CSRF for POST requests and returns early for non-POST methods. Several application endpoints perform state-changing operations while accepting parameters from GET (or $_REQUEST), so an attacker can perform CSRF by forcing a victim's browser to issue a crafted GET request. Impact: creation of admin accounts, modification of admin email/password, and full admin account takeover.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Easy!Appointments 1.5.2 and earlier can allow a malicious website to make a logged-in administrator’s browser perform sensitive actions. The reported impact includes creating admin accounts, changing admin email or password, and full admin account takeover. Successful abuse requires user interaction, such as an administrator visiting attacker-controlled content while authenticated.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for any organization using Easy!Appointments. The vulnerability can compromise administrator control of scheduling systems, but exploitation requires an authenticated admin’s browser interaction. Move quickly to identify deployments, check vendor guidance, and monitor for unauthorized admin changes.

Technical view

CVE-2026-23622 is a CSRF protection bypass in Easy!Appointments. The CSRF check in EA_Security.php reportedly enforces tokens only for POST and returns early for non-POST methods. Some state-changing endpoints accept GET or request parameters, allowing cross-site requests to trigger privileged changes. CVSS v4.0 is 7.4 high; CWE-352 applies.

Likely exposure

Self-hosted Easy!Appointments deployments running version 1.5.2 or earlier are in scope. Exposure is higher where administrators use the application from browsers that may also visit untrusted sites. The sources do not identify specific hosting configurations, public internet exposure requirements, or affected CPEs.

Exploitation context

The CVE record marks this as requiring user interaction and no prior attacker privileges. The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and it is not listed as KEV in the source bundle. The impact is serious because a successful CSRF can lead to administrator account takeover.

Researcher notes

Evidence comes from the CVE record and GitHub advisory reference in the source bundle. The bundle names affected versions and root cause, but does not include a fixed version or confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming patch availability beyond vendor guidance. Validate behavior safely in authorized test environments only.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Easy!Appointments instances and confirm their versions.
  • Check the GitHub advisory and vendor project for fixed versions or official guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or business-critical scheduling deployments.
  • Until fixed, reduce administrator exposure to untrusted links and websites.
  • Review administrative accounts and settings for unauthorized changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed Easy!Appointments versions are 1.5.2 or earlier.
  • Review application logs for unexpected admin account creation or credential changes.
  • Check whether sensitive endpoints accept non-POST state-changing requests.
  • Verify CSRF protections apply to state-changing requests after remediation.
  • Document affected instances, owners, and remediation status.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23622 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.4High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-23622Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
alextselegidiseasyappointments<= 1.5.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.