LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23527: h3 v1 has Request Smuggling (TE.TE) issue

H3 is a minimal H(TTP) framework built for high performance and portability. Prior to 1.15.5, there is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability. readRawBody is doing a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding header. It explicitly looks for "chunked", but per the RFC, this header should be case-insensitive. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.5.

HighCVSS 8.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-23527 affects h3, a JavaScript HTTP framework. Older versions mishandle Transfer-Encoding header casing, creating a request smuggling risk. In affected deployments, attackers may cause front-end and back-end HTTP components to disagree about request boundaries. This can threaten confidentiality and integrity. The vendor states the issue is fixed in h3 1.15.5.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority dependency update for exposed web applications using h3. Business urgency is highest where h3-backed services sit behind proxies or gateways. No active exploitation is confirmed in the provided sources, but the potential data impact is significant.

Technical view

h3 versions before 1.15.5 perform a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding value "chunked" in readRawBody, despite RFC case-insensitivity. The advisory describes this as a critical HTTP Request Smuggling TE.TE issue, mapped to CWE-444. CVSS is 8.9 with network attack vector, no privileges or user interaction, high confidentiality and integrity impact, and high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Node.js applications or frameworks that directly or transitively depend on h3 versions earlier than 1.15.5 and process HTTP requests behind proxies, gateways, load balancers, or other HTTP intermediaries.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public write-up material exists, but this assessment should not treat exploitation as observed. Request smuggling impact depends heavily on deployment architecture and intermediary behavior.

Researcher notes

Focus analysis on h3 readRawBody behavior before 1.15.5 and environments with multiple HTTP parsers. Avoid assuming exploitability without matching proxy and application behavior. The fixing commit and release notes are the key primary sources for code-level verification.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade h3 to version 1.15.5 or later.
  • Check transitive dependencies that may bundle or pin h3 below 1.15.5.
  • Review vendor advisory and release notes for project-specific guidance.
  • Prioritize internet-facing services behind HTTP intermediaries.

Validation and detection

  • Search package manifests and lockfiles for h3 versions below 1.15.5.
  • Use software composition analysis to identify transitive h3 usage.
  • Confirm deployed artifacts match updated dependency versions.
  • Review edge, proxy, and application architecture for HTTP request parsing chains.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-444: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23527 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.9CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L2.26Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.9High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-23527Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
h3jsh3< 1.15.5Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-444 · source CWE mapping

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.