LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23520: Arcane has a Command Injection in Arcane Updater Lifecycle Labels Enables RCE

Arcane provides modern docker management. Prior to 1.13.0, Arcane has a command injection in the updater service. Arcane’s updater service supported lifecycle labels com.getarcaneapp.arcane.lifecycle.pre-update and com.getarcaneapp.arcane.lifecycle.post-update that allowed defining a command to run before or after a container update. The label value is passed directly to /bin/sh -c without sanitization or validation. Because any authenticated user (not limited to administrators) can create projects through the API, an attacker can create a project that specifies one of these lifecycle labels with a malicious command. When an administrator later triggers a container update (either manually or via scheduled update checks), Arcane reads the lifecycle label and executes its value as a shell command inside the container. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.0.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Arcane before 1.13.0 lets a low-privileged authenticated user set update lifecycle labels that later cause shell commands to run when an administrator updates a container. This can turn ordinary project creation access into remote code execution inside the container.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any shared Arcane environment. A normal authenticated user could cause code execution during routine updates, creating high confidentiality, integrity, and availability risk. Prioritize upgrade and access review before further scheduled updates where feasible.

Technical view

CVE-2026-23520 is CWE-78 command injection in Arcane’s updater service. Values from com.getarcaneapp.arcane.lifecycle.pre-update and post-update labels are passed to /bin/sh -c without sanitization. Any authenticated API user can create a project with such labels; execution occurs when an admin or scheduled process triggers container updates.

Likely exposure

Organizations running getarcaneapp Arcane versions earlier than 1.13.0 are affected, especially where multiple authenticated users can create projects through the API. Exposure depends on whether untrusted or lower-privileged users have Arcane accounts and whether container updates are performed manually or scheduled.

Exploitation context

The advisory indicates exploitation requires authenticated access and a later update action by an administrator or scheduled update process. The CVSS vector is network, low complexity, low privileges, and user interaction required. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The key trust-boundary issue is that user-controlled lifecycle label values reach shell execution in the updater path. The vendor states the issue is fixed in 1.13.0. Public sources provided do not establish exploitation in the wild or impact beyond execution inside the container.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Arcane to version 1.13.0 or later.
  • Review vendor advisory and release notes for any additional hardening guidance.
  • Restrict project creation to trusted users until upgraded.
  • Review existing projects for updater lifecycle labels before triggering updates.
  • Audit recent Arcane project changes by non-administrative users.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Arcane deployments and confirm version is below or at least 1.13.0.
  • Check whether authenticated non-admin users can create projects through the API.
  • Inspect project/container metadata for the documented pre-update and post-update lifecycle labels.
  • Review update schedules and recent administrator-triggered container updates.
  • Confirm the 1.13.0 fix is deployed in production and backups.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23520 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-23520Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
getarcaneapparcane< 1.13.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.