LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-23511: ZITADEL has a user enumeration vulnerability in Login UIs

ZITADEL is an open source identity management platform. Prior to 4.9.1 and 3.4.6, a user enumeration vulnerability has been discovered in Zitadel's login interfaces. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to confirm the existence of valid user accounts by iterating through usernames and userIDs. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.9.1 and 3.4.6.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

ZITADEL login pages can reveal whether a username or user ID exists. That information can help attackers build valid account lists for later phishing, password guessing, or targeted attacks. The issue is fixed in ZITADEL 4.9.1 and 3.4.6. No source in the bundle reports active exploitation.

Executive priority

Schedule remediation in the normal vulnerability cycle, with faster action for public identity services. This issue does not enable direct takeover by itself, but it can improve attacker targeting against real users.

Technical view

CVE-2026-23511 is a CWE-204 observable response discrepancy in ZITADEL Login UIs. Unauthenticated network attackers can confirm valid usernames or userIDs by comparing login-interface behavior. CVSS is 5.3: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, confidentiality impact only. Affected versions are >=4.0.0 and <4.9.1, and versions <3.4.6.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant for internet-facing or broadly reachable ZITADEL login interfaces running affected versions. Organizations using ZITADEL as a central identity provider should treat this as identity intelligence leakage, not direct account compromise.

Exploitation context

The public description confirms unauthenticated enumeration through login interfaces. The provided sources do not indicate public exploitation, KEV listing, or compromise activity. Risk increases where usernames are reused, predictable, or tied to employee email addresses.

Researcher notes

The advisory identifies the weakness class and fixed versions, but the bundle does not include detailed behavioral conditions for each UI path. Avoid assuming all deployments expose the same surface; validate against deployed version, configuration, and reachable login flows.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade ZITADEL 4.x deployments to 4.9.1 or later.
  • Upgrade ZITADEL 3.x deployments to 3.4.6 or later.
  • Check ZITADEL vendor advisory and release notes before production rollout.
  • Restrict unnecessary public exposure of login interfaces where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor authentication telemetry for unusual repeated account-discovery patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all ZITADEL instances and record running versions.
  • Confirm whether affected login interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Verify upgraded instances report version 4.9.1, 3.4.6, or later.
  • Review release notes and advisory applicability for your deployment branch.
  • Review authentication logs for abnormal username or userID probing.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-204: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-23511 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-23511Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
zitadelzitadel>= 4.0.0, < 4.9.1, < 3.4.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-204 · source CWE mapping

Observable Response Discrepancy

Observable Response Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.