LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22861: iccDEV has a heap-buffer-overflow in SIccCalcOp::Describe() at IccProfLib/IccMpeCalc.cpp

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of International Color Consortium (ICC) color management profiles. Prior to 2.3.1.2, There is a heap-based buffer overflow in SIccCalcOp::Describe() at IccProfLib/IccMpeCalc.cpp. This vulnerability affects users of the iccDEV library who process ICC color profiles. The vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.1.2.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22861 is a high-severity memory corruption issue in iccDEV before 2.3.1.2. An attacker could supply a malicious ICC color profile that triggers a heap buffer overflow when processed. Business urgency depends on whether your products, services, or workflows parse untrusted ICC profiles.

Executive priority

Treat as a priority patch for teams handling image, print, color-management, or file-upload workflows. The issue is high impact, but urgency should be driven by confirmed iccDEV use and whether untrusted ICC profiles are processed.

Technical view

The flaw is a heap-based buffer overflow in SIccCalcOp::Describe() in IccProfLib/IccMpeCalc.cpp. It affects International Color Consortium iccDEV versions before 2.3.1.2. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and required user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in software that embeds or depends on iccDEV and processes ICC color profiles from users, partners, files, images, print workflows, or automated ingestion pipelines. Statically linked copies may be missed by standard package scanning.

Exploitation context

The CVE data does not indicate active exploitation, and it is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires a crafted ICC profile to be processed by affected software. Successful exploitation could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability according to the CVSS rating.

Researcher notes

Primary evidence comes from the GitHub advisory, CVE record, related pull requests, and fixing commit. CWE mappings include classic buffer handling and length-check weaknesses. The public bundle names the fixed version but does not provide evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade iccDEV to version 2.3.1.2 or later.
  • Identify products and internal tools that process ICC profiles using iccDEV.
  • Check vendor guidance for applications bundling iccDEV.
  • Restrict processing of untrusted ICC profiles where upgrade is delayed.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or user-upload processing paths.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the deployed iccDEV version is 2.3.1.2 or later.
  • Review software bills of materials for iccDEV dependencies.
  • Check for statically linked or vendored iccDEV copies.
  • Verify ICC profile ingestion paths are known and controlled.
  • Confirm vendor-supplied updates have been applied where applicable.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-130: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-252: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22861 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-22861Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
InternationalColorConsortiumiccDEV< 2.3.1.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-130 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency

Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-252 · source CWE mapping

Unchecked Return Value

Unchecked Return Value represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.