LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22742: Server-Side Request Forgery in BedrockProxyChatModel via Unvalidated Media URL Fetching

Spring AI's spring-ai-bedrock-converse contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BedrockProxyChatModel when processing multimodal messages that include user-supplied media URLs. Insufficient validation of those URLs allows an attacker to induce the server to issue HTTP requests to unintended internal or external destinations. This issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Spring AI's Bedrock chat integration lets an attacker trick the server into fetching content from web addresses the attacker chooses. Because the server makes those requests on the user's behalf, it can be steered toward internal systems that should never be reachable from outside, potentially exposing sensitive metadata or internal services through the application.

Executive priority

Prioritize patching within standard high-severity SLA. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication and scoped to a specific Spring AI component, so impact depends on whether your applications use the affected Bedrock proxy with user-supplied media URLs. Treat as a targeted upgrade rather than a fleet-wide emergency, but do not defer.

Technical view

CVE-2026-22742 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in Spring AI's spring-ai-bedrock-converse module. BedrockProxyChatModel accepts user-supplied media URLs in multimodal messages without sufficient validation, causing the server to issue outbound HTTP requests to attacker-controlled destinations. Affected versions: 1.0.0 before 1.0.5 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.4. CVSS 3.1 score is 8.6 with scope change (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H).

Likely exposure

Applications built on Spring AI 1.0.0–1.0.4 or 1.1.0–1.1.3 that expose BedrockProxyChatModel and accept multimodal prompts containing user-supplied media URLs. Risk is elevated for services deployed in cloud environments where reachable internal endpoints (metadata services, internal APIs, admin consoles) increase the blast radius of a successful SSRF.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is cited in the source bundle and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV. The advisory was published 2026-03-27 and updated 2026-05-10, indicating recent vendor attention. CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates remote, unauthenticated abuse is feasible where the affected endpoint accepts external media URLs.

Researcher notes

CVSS scope is Changed (S:C) with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability impact, consistent with SSRF used for information disclosure rather than data tampering. The advisory lists two affected version lines (1.0.x and 1.1.x), so verify both branches in any deployment. No public PoC, KEV listing, or exploitation reporting is referenced in the provided bundle; revisit vendor advisory for any post-disclosure updates.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Spring AI to 1.0.5 or 1.1.4 per the vendor advisory at spring.io/security/cve-2026-22742.
  • Inventory services using spring-ai-bedrock-converse and BedrockProxyChatModel.
  • Restrict outbound egress from AI service hosts to only required destinations.
  • Block requests to internal address ranges and cloud metadata endpoints at the network layer.
  • Validate and allowlist media URL schemes and hosts before passing them to the model.
  • Consult Spring's security advisory for any additional vendor-recommended guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Identify Spring AI dependency versions via build manifests (pom.xml, build.gradle).
  • Confirm whether BedrockProxyChatModel is configured and reachable by external clients.
  • Review application logs for outbound fetches triggered by chat media URLs.
  • After upgrade, verify the resolved spring-ai-bedrock-converse version is 1.0.5+ or 1.1.4+.
  • Re-test multimodal endpoints to confirm internal targets and metadata endpoints are no longer reachable.
  • Monitor egress traffic from AI workloads for anomalous outbound destinations.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22742 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N3.94vmware

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-22742Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SpringSpring AI1.0.0, 1.1.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.