LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22597: Ghost has SSRF via External Media Inliner

Ghost is a Node.js content management system. In versions 5.38.0 through 5.130.5 and 6.0.0 through 6.10.3, a vulnerability in Ghost’s media inliner mechanism allows staff users in possession of a valid authentication token for the Ghost Admin API to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF. This issue has been patched in versions 5.130.6 and 6.11.0.

MediumCVSS 5.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22597 affects Ghost, a Node.js content management system. An authenticated staff user with a valid Ghost Admin API token could abuse the external media inliner to make Ghost request internal systems and leak data. This is not a drive-by internet bug; it requires privileged access. Patched Ghost versions are available.

Executive priority

Treat as a timely patching item, not an emergency, unless Ghost can reach sensitive internal systems or staff tokens may be compromised. Prioritize internet-facing or highly connected Ghost deployments and environments with broad internal network access.

Technical view

The issue is server-side request forgery in Ghost’s media inliner mechanism, classified as CWE-918. Affected versions are 5.38.0 through before 5.130.6 and 6.0.0 through before 6.11.0. CVSS v4.0 score is 5.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, and high privileges required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running affected Ghost versions with staff users or tokens able to access the Ghost Admin API. Risk is higher where Ghost can reach sensitive internal services, metadata endpoints, management interfaces, or private APIs from the server network.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. Exploitation requires a valid staff authentication token for the Ghost Admin API. The impact described is exfiltration of data from internal systems reachable by the Ghost server via SSRF.

Researcher notes

Sources identify SSRF through the external media inliner and patch commits, but the bundle does not include detailed exploit mechanics. Avoid assuming unauthenticated impact. Key validation is version range, Admin API token exposure, staff access controls, and internal network reachability from the Ghost host.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Ghost 5.x deployments to 5.130.6 or later.
  • Upgrade Ghost 6.x deployments to 6.11.0 or later.
  • Review Ghost vendor advisory and linked commits for implementation details.
  • Restrict Ghost server egress to only required destinations where feasible.
  • Review and rotate exposed or unnecessary Ghost Admin API tokens.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Ghost instances and record exact versions.
  • Confirm no instance runs 5.38.0-5.130.5 or 6.0.0-6.10.3.
  • Identify who holds staff access and Ghost Admin API tokens.
  • Review outbound network paths from Ghost to internal services.
  • Check logs for unusual media inliner activity if available.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22597 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-22597Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TryGhostGhost>= 6.0.0, < 6.11.0, >= 5.38.0, < 5.130.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.