LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22482: WordPress IMGspider plugin <= 2.3.12 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wbolt.com IMGspider imgspider allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects IMGspider: from n/a through <= 2.3.12.

MediumCVSS 4.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22482 affects the WordPress IMGspider plugin up to version 2.3.12. It is a server-side request forgery issue, meaning an authenticated user could potentially make the website server request unintended internal or external resources. The public record rates it medium severity, and there is no provided evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin risk. It is not currently evidenced as exploited, but SSRF can create exposure to internal services or sensitive network paths. Validate whether the plugin is present, restrict access, and track vendor remediation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-918 SSRF in wbolt.com IMGspider/imgspider for WordPress, affecting versions through 2.3.12. CVSS 3.1 is 4.9: network attack vector, high complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact. Availability impact is not indicated.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the IMGspider plugin installed at version 2.3.12 or earlier. Exploitation requires a low-privileged authenticated user, according to the CVSS vector. Sites without the plugin, or not running affected versions, are not indicated as affected.

Exploitation context

The sources describe an SSRF vulnerability but do not provide exploit details. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Attack complexity is rated high, reducing likelihood compared with easily exploitable WordPress issues.

Researcher notes

Public data is limited to the CVE metadata and Patchstack entry. No patch version, proof of concept, or exploitation-in-the-wild evidence is included in the provided sources. The CVSS vector indicates authenticated, high-complexity exploitation with limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the IMGspider plugin and its installed version.
  • Prioritize review of sites running IMGspider 2.3.12 or earlier.
  • Check Patchstack, the CVE record, and vendor channels for fixed-version guidance.
  • Restrict plugin access to trusted users until vendor remediation is confirmed.
  • Monitor web logs for unusual outbound request patterns from affected WordPress servers.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether IMGspider is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the plugin version and compare it with the affected range.
  • Review user roles with access to IMGspider-related functionality.
  • Check vendor and Patchstack pages for updated remediation information.
  • Document compensating controls if no fixed version is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22482 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N1.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-22482Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
wbolt.comIMGspiderimgspider, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.