LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22358: WordPress Electrician - Electrical Service WordPress theme <= 5.6 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft Electrician - Electrical Service WordPress electrician allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Electrician - Electrical Service WordPress: from n/a through <= 5.6.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22358 is a server-side request forgery issue in the SmartDataSoft Electrician WordPress theme, reported for versions through 5.6. An attacker could make the website server initiate unintended requests. The published severity is medium, not because it is harmless, but because exploitation is rated high complexity with limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress exposure. Prioritize internet-facing sites using this specific theme, especially in hosting environments with access to internal services. The main business risk is unauthorized internal request activity, not confirmed ransomware-style exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-918 SSRF in Electrician - Electrical Service WordPress theme <= 5.6. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network exploitable, no privileges or user interaction, high attack complexity, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact. The provided sources do not identify a specific vulnerable endpoint, patch version, or mitigation.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites using the SmartDataSoft Electrician theme at version 5.6 or earlier. Sites not using this theme are not indicated as affected. Confirm actual theme name and version from WordPress inventory, hosting records, or file metadata.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is stated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is remote and unauthenticated, but high complexity. SSRF risk depends heavily on server network reachability and accessible internal services.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The bundle names SSRF and affected versions through 5.6, but does not provide endpoint details, proof-of-concept status, or a fixed version. The affected metadata also lists an unusual version value of “0,” so validate against the descriptive affected range and vendor records.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Electrician theme and version.
  • Check SmartDataSoft and Patchstack guidance for an official fixed version or workaround.
  • Update only if a vendor-supported fixed release is available.
  • If no fix is available, consider disabling or replacing the theme.
  • Limit server outbound access to internal metadata and administrative services.
  • Monitor web and egress logs for unusual server-initiated requests.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the Electrician theme is installed and active.
  • Record the installed theme version and compare it to <= 5.6.
  • Review vendor or Patchstack advisories for updated remediation details.
  • Check whether affected sites can reach sensitive internal services.
  • Look for unexpected outbound requests from WordPress hosting infrastructure.
  • Document compensating controls if patch status remains unclear.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22358 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.22.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-22358Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SmartDataSoftElectrician - Electrical Service WordPresselectrician, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.