LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22233: OPEXUS eCASE Audit Project Cost stored XSS

OPEXUS eCASE Audit allows an authenticated attacker to save JavaScript as a comment in the "Estimated Staff Hours" field. The JavaScript is executed whenever another user visits the Project Cost tab. Fixed in OPEXUS eCASE Audit 11.14.2.0.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated OPEXUS eCASE Audit user can store JavaScript in a Project Cost-related field. When another user opens the Project Cost tab, the script runs in that user’s browser. This can expose or alter limited data and disrupt use, but requires login access and victim interaction. The issue is reported fixed in version 11.14.2.0.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled but prompt remediation item. It is not currently supported as actively exploited, but stored XSS can affect other users, including higher-privileged staff. Prioritize upgrade planning for exposed or heavily used eCASE Audit environments.

Technical view

CVE-2026-22233 is a stored cross-site scripting issue, CWE-79, in OPEXUS eCASE Audit. JavaScript can be saved as a comment in the “Estimated Staff Hours” field and executes when another user views the Project Cost tab. CVSS 3.1 is 5.5: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running OPEXUS eCASE Audit with users who can access and edit the affected Project Cost area. Public source data lists affected versions ambiguously, while also stating 11.14.2.0 contains the fix. Confirm deployed versions and vendor applicability guidance.

Exploitation context

Sources describe an authenticated stored XSS condition requiring low privileges and user interaction. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Risk increases where many users share projects or where privileged users review Project Cost tabs.

Researcher notes

The provided data has version ambiguity: the affected list includes 11.14.2.0, while the description says 11.14.2.0 is fixed. Do not assume a broader affected range without vendor confirmation. Validate field-level input handling and output encoding only in authorized test environments.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OPEXUS eCASE Audit to 11.14.2.0 or later if vendor guidance confirms applicability.
  • Review OPEXUS release notes and advisories for exact affected-version guidance.
  • Limit edit access to Project Cost fields until remediation is complete.
  • Monitor for suspicious comments or unexpected script-like content in Estimated Staff Hours records.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OPEXUS eCASE Audit deployments and record exact version numbers.
  • Confirm whether deployed versions are earlier than the fixed 11.14.2.0 release.
  • Review Project Cost tab access roles and users with comment-edit privileges.
  • Check vendor release notes or support channels for official remediation confirmation.
  • After upgrade, verify the application reports the corrected version.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22233 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L2.13.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-22233Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

  • CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
  • urlCVE reference · release-notes
  • urlCVE reference · government-resource, third-party-advisory
  • urlCVE reference · vdb-entry
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OPEXUSeCASE Audit11.4.0, 11.14.2.0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.