LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22194: GestSup <= 3.2.56 CSRF Allows Privileged Actions

GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application does not verify the authenticity of client requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in user to submit crafted requests that perform actions with the victim's privileges. This can be exploited to create privileged accounts by targeting the administrative user creation endpoint.

HighCVSS 8.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22194 is a CSRF issue in GestSup. If an administrator is logged in, an attacker could trick them into triggering privileged actions, including creating privileged accounts. The provided sources rate it high severity. No source provided here confirms active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a near-term priority for teams using GestSup. The issue could let attackers gain privileged access by abusing an authenticated administrator session, but current provided evidence does not show known active exploitation.

Technical view

GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 are described as failing to verify request authenticity, enabling cross-site request forgery against privileged workflows. The advisory specifically mentions administrative user creation. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.9, with network attack vector, low complexity, required user interaction, and high impacts.

Likely exposure

Organizations running GestSup, especially where administrators access the application through a browser, may be exposed. Risk is higher if the GestSup administrative interface is reachable from broad internal or internet-facing networks.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires inducing a logged-in GestSup user, likely an administrator, to submit attacker-crafted requests. KEV is false in the provided bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation.

Researcher notes

There is a source inconsistency: the title says <= 3.2.56, while the description says <= 3.2.60. Use vendor changelog and VulnCheck advisory to confirm exact affected and fixed versions before final scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Check GestSup changelog and vendor guidance for the fixed or recommended version.
  • Upgrade affected GestSup instances if the vendor identifies a safe release.
  • Limit access to GestSup administrative functions to trusted users and networks.
  • Warn administrators not to browse untrusted links while authenticated to GestSup.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all GestSup deployments and record installed versions.
  • Prioritize systems running versions up to and including 3.2.60.
  • Review administrative user creation workflows for CSRF protection controls.
  • Check logs for unexpected privileged account creation or administrative changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22194 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.9CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:H/SA:H——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.9High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-22194Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GestSupGestSup0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.