LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22190: Panda3D <= 1.10.16 egg-mkfont Format String Information Disclosure

The egg-mkfont utility in Panda3D versions up to and including 1.10.16 contains an uncontrolled format string vulnerability. The -gp (glyph pattern) command-line option is used directly as the format string for sprintf() with only a single argument supplied. If an attacker provides additional format specifiers, egg-mkfont may read unintended stack values and write the formatted output into generated .egg and .png files, resulting in disclosure of stack-resident memory and pointer values.

MediumCVSS 5.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22190 affects Panda3D’s egg-mkfont utility through its glyph pattern option. A malicious or unsafe command-line value can cause the tool to copy unintended stack memory values into generated font output files. This is primarily a confidentiality issue for development or build environments, not a remote server takeover scenario based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted build-chain confidentiality risk. Prioritize teams that publish assets from automated builds or accept external game/font assets. It is not currently evidenced as mass-exploited, but it can leak sensitive memory values into artifacts if unsafe inputs reach egg-mkfont.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-134: uncontrolled format string. In Panda3D up to and including 1.10.16, egg-mkfont passes the -gp value directly to sprintf() as a format string with only one argument. Extra format specifiers may read stack-resident values and emit them into generated .egg and .png files. CVSS v4.0 is 5.1, local attack vector.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Panda3D egg-mkfont is installed and used in automated asset, font, game, or build pipelines. Risk increases if -gp values can be influenced by untrusted project files, users, CI inputs, or third-party asset workflows.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe technical exploitability and include a public technical reference, but the CVE is not listed as KEV and no cited source states active exploitation. Exploitation requires local tool execution with a crafted glyph pattern value and results in information disclosure through generated output files.

Researcher notes

The affected-version data in the provided bundle is inconsistent: the narrative says Panda3D <=1.10.16, while the structured affected entry lists version 0 with defaultStatus unaffected. Use vendor and CVE updates to confirm exact affected releases. Do not assume remote exploitability from the available evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Panda3D guidance for a fixed release or official patch.
  • Avoid processing untrusted glyph pattern values with egg-mkfont.
  • Restrict who can modify asset-build inputs and CI font-generation parameters.
  • Review generated .egg and .png artifacts before publishing from untrusted builds.
  • Isolate asset conversion jobs from secrets and sensitive environment data.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Panda3D installations and egg-mkfont usage across developer and CI systems.
  • Identify versions up to and including Panda3D 1.10.16.
  • Review build scripts for dynamic or user-controlled -gp values.
  • Check whether generated font artifacts leave controlled build environments.
  • Monitor CVE, Panda3D, and VulnCheck pages for remediation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-134: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22190 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-22190Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Panda3DPanda3D0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-134 · source CWE mapping

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.