LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-22189: Panda3D <= 1.10.16 egg-mkfont Stack Buffer Overflow

The egg-mkfont utility in Panda3D versions up to and including 1.10.16 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability due to use of an unbounded sprintf() call with attacker-controlled input. When constructing glyph filenames, egg-mkfont formats a user-supplied glyph pattern (-gp) into a fixed-size stack buffer without length validation. Supplying an excessively long glyph pattern string can overflow the stack buffer, resulting in memory corruption and a deterministic crash. Depending on build configuration and execution environment, the overflow may also be exploitable for arbitrary code execution.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-22189 affects Panda3D’s egg-mkfont utility, not the whole runtime by default. A very long user-supplied glyph pattern can crash the tool and may allow code execution in some builds. Business urgency is highest where Panda3D tooling runs in automated asset pipelines or handles untrusted inputs.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted build-tool risk, not an internet-wide emergency. Prioritize teams using Panda3D in automated pipelines, game asset processing, or shared developer environments. The main immediate concern is disruption, with possible code execution depending on build protections.

Technical view

egg-mkfont in Panda3D up to and including 1.10.16 uses an unbounded sprintf() while building glyph filenames from the -gp glyph pattern. The fixed-size stack buffer can overflow, causing memory corruption and deterministic crash. The CVSS v4.0 score is 6.9, local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to systems where Panda3D’s egg-mkfont utility is installed and executable. Risk increases if build, CI, or asset-conversion workflows accept glyph patterns or font-generation parameters from untrusted users or repositories.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. Public references include a Full Disclosure post tagged as exploit and a VulnCheck advisory, so defenders should assume technical details are publicly available.

Researcher notes

The source bundle contains an inconsistency: the narrative says Panda3D versions through 1.10.16 are affected, while the affected block lists version “0” with defaultStatus “unaffected.” Validate against the CVE record, VulnCheck advisory, and Panda3D upstream before final scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Panda3D installations and locate egg-mkfont usage.
  • Avoid processing untrusted glyph patterns or font-generation inputs.
  • Restrict who can run egg-mkfont on build systems.
  • Check Panda3D vendor guidance for fixed versions or patches.
  • Upgrade when an official fixed release is identified.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed Panda3D versions against 1.10.16 and earlier.
  • Review CI and asset pipelines for egg-mkfont execution.
  • Search build scripts for glyph pattern parameter usage.
  • Confirm untrusted repositories cannot control egg-mkfont inputs.
  • Monitor vendor repository and advisories for remediation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-22189 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-22189Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Panda3DPanda3D0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.