LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-21907: Junos Space: TLS/SSL server supports use of static key ciphers (ssl-static-key-ciphers)

A Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in the TLS/SSL server of Juniper Networks Junos Space allows the use of static key ciphers (ssl-static-key-ciphers), reducing the confidentiality of on-path traffic communicated across the connection. These ciphers also do not support Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS), affecting the long-term confidentiality of encrypted communications.This issue affects all versions of Junos Space before 24.1R5.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Junos Space TLS/SSL can allow static key cipher suites. These weaken confidentiality because they lack Perfect Forward Secrecy, so captured encrypted traffic may have weaker long-term protection. Juniper states all Junos Space versions before 24.1R5 are affected.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for Junos Space systems handling sensitive management traffic or exposed beyond tightly controlled networks. This is a confidentiality issue, not a reported outage or takeover issue, but the CVSS score is High.

Technical view

CVE-2026-21907 is CWE-327 in the Junos Space TLS/SSL server. CVSS v4.0 is 8.2 High. The issue permits ssl-static-key-ciphers, reducing confidentiality for on-path communications. No integrity or availability impact is described in the provided sources.

Likely exposure

Organizations running Juniper Networks Junos Space before 24.1R5, especially where its TLS/SSL service is reachable by users, administrators, or networks carrying sensitive management traffic.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and KEV is false. Risk centers on an on-path attacker observing or influencing protected communications when static key ciphers are available or negotiated.

Researcher notes

Key facts: Junos Space before 24.1R5; CWE-327; CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/RE:M/U:Green. The affected version data in the bundle is sparse, so rely on the vendor advisory for exact release guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Junos Space to 24.1R5 or a later vendor-supported release.
  • Review Juniper advisory JSA106006 for any additional vendor instructions.
  • Restrict access to Junos Space management interfaces to trusted networks.
  • If vendor-supported, configure TLS to avoid static key cipher suites.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Junos Space instances and record installed versions.
  • Flag any Junos Space version earlier than 24.1R5 as affected.
  • Use approved TLS assessment tooling to check whether static key ciphers are offered.
  • After remediation, verify only vendor-approved cipher suites remain enabled.
  • Monitor Juniper advisory JSA106006 for updates or revised guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-327: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-21907 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/RE:M/U:Green

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/RE:M/U:Green——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.2High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-21907Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/RE:M/U:Green

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Juniper NetworksJunos Space0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-327 · source CWE mapping

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.