LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-21724: Missing Protected-field Authorization in Provisioning Contact Points API

A vulnerability has been discovered in Grafana OSS where an authorization bypass in the provisioning contact points API allows users with Editor role to modify protected webhook URLs without the required alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write permission.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Authenticated Grafana OSS Editors may change webhook destinations that should require a stronger permission. This could redirect alert notifications or expose information sent through them. The issue does not permit unauthenticated access, and the supplied sources do not indicate service disruption or broader administrative control.

Executive priority

Treat as a scheduled, moderately urgent remediation. Prioritize internet-accessible or shared Grafana instances, environments with numerous Editors, and alerting workflows carrying sensitive data. Escalate if review finds unexpected webhook changes or untrusted Editor access.

Technical view

The provisioning contact points API fails to enforce the protected-field write authorization for webhook URLs. An Editor can therefore modify that protected field without alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write. The issue is classified as CWE-285 and CVSS 3.1 score 5.4, reflecting network reachability, low complexity, required privileges, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Grafana OSS deployments running the listed affected releases—12.3.1, 12.2.2, 12.1.5, or 11.6.9—where Editor accounts can reach the provisioning API and protected webhook contact points are used. Other versions are marked unaffected in the supplied record.

Exploitation context

The flaw requires an authenticated user with the Editor role and no user interaction. The supplied record is not in CISA KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation or a public exploit. Abuse could alter protected webhook destinations, affecting alert confidentiality and integrity.

Researcher notes

The authorization gap concerns field-level enforcement rather than general endpoint authentication. Assessment should focus on the provisioning contact points API, Editor-role authorization, protected webhook fields, and enforcement of alert.notifications.receivers.protected:write. The supplied evidence does not identify affected commercial editions, root cause details, exploit availability, or a specific fixed version.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Grafana's advisory for the vendor-approved remediation or fixed release.
  • Upgrade affected Grafana OSS installations according to current vendor guidance.
  • Temporarily limit Editor access to trusted users until remediation is confirmed.
  • Monitor provisioning contact-point changes, particularly protected webhook URLs.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Grafana OSS versions and identify the four listed affected releases.
  • Identify Editor accounts able to access provisioning contact-point functionality.
  • Review audit or configuration history for unexpected webhook URL changes.
  • After remediation, verify Editors cannot modify protected URLs without the required permission.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-285: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-21724 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.5GRAFANA

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-21724Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GrafanaGrafana OSS12.3.1, 12.2.2, 12.1.5, 11.6.9unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-285 · source CWE mapping

Improper Authorization

Improper Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.