LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-21673: iccDEV has Integer Overflow/Underflow in CIccXmlArrayType::ParseTextCountNum()

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Versions 2.3.1 and below have overflows and underflows in CIccXmlArrayType::ParseTextCountNum(). This vulnerability affects users of the iccDEV library who process ICC color profiles. This issue is fixed in version 2.3.1.1.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-21673 is a high-severity memory-safety issue in iccDEV, a library for handling ICC color profiles. A malicious color profile processed by affected software could cause serious impact, including confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise. User interaction is required, and no active exploitation is reported in the provided sources.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for systems that process untrusted color profiles or expose file-import workflows. The issue is high severity, but urgency is moderated by required user interaction and no cited evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

iccDEV versions before 2.3.1.1 contain integer overflow/underflow and type conversion issues in CIccXmlArrayType::ParseTextCountNum(). The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.8 with local attack vector and required user interaction. The issue affects users processing ICC color profiles with vulnerable iccDEV versions and is fixed in 2.3.1.1.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where iccDEV is embedded in applications, tools, or workflows that import or process ICC color profiles. Risk is higher for systems handling untrusted profiles from users, partners, downloads, or automated media/color-processing pipelines.

Exploitation context

The provided CVSS vector indicates local exploitation with low complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required. The sources do not report active exploitation, public weaponization, or inclusion in CISA KEV.

Researcher notes

The public record identifies the vulnerable function and fix commit but provides limited operational detail. Avoid assuming affected downstream products without dependency evidence. Focus validation on version detection, ICC profile ingestion paths, and whether the patched commit or 2.3.1.1 release is present.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade iccDEV to version 2.3.1.1 or later.
  • Identify downstream products or internal tools bundling vulnerable iccDEV versions.
  • Restrict processing of untrusted ICC profiles until patched.
  • Monitor the GitHub advisory and vendor channels for updated guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems and builds using iccDEV.
  • Confirm iccDEV version is 2.3.1.1 or later.
  • Review SBOMs and dependency manifests for embedded iccDEV.
  • Check whether applications process user-supplied ICC color profiles.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-681: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-704: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-21673 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-21673Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
InternationalColorConsortiumiccDEV< 2.3.1.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-681 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types

Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-704 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast

Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.