CVE-2026-21413: A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the lossless_jpeg_load_raw functionality of LibRaw Com...
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the lossless_jpeg_load_raw functionality of LibRaw Commit 0b56545 and Commit d20315b. A specially crafted malicious file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
LibRaw has a critical memory corruption flaw triggered by a malicious image file. Software that uses the affected LibRaw commits to process untrusted image uploads or files could be exposed. The source bundle does not show confirmed active exploitation, but the potential impact includes confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss.
Executive priority
Treat as urgent for systems that ingest images from customers, partners, or the internet. Prioritize patch verification and exposure reduction before routine maintenance windows for externally reachable processing workflows.
Technical view
CVE-2026-21413 is a heap-based buffer overflow in LibRaw's lossless_jpeg_load_raw functionality, associated with CWE-129 and CWE-787. The bundle lists affected LibRaw commits 0b56545 and d20315b. CVSS 3.1 is 9.8 with network, low-complexity, unauthenticated impact ratings.
Likely exposure
Highest exposure is in services, pipelines, or desktop tools that parse user-supplied RAW or JPEG-derived files through LibRaw. Indirect exposure may exist through image processing products bundling LibRaw, but the bundle names only LibRaw and Red Hat advisory references.
Exploitation context
The sources say an attacker can provide a specially crafted malicious file to trigger the vulnerability. KEV is false in the bundle, and no cited source here confirms active exploitation or public weaponization.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports a critical LibRaw heap overflow, but the bundle does not provide fixed upstream versions or exploit-in-the-wild confirmation. Avoid expanding affected products beyond LibRaw and referenced Red Hat packages without vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Apply relevant vendor updates from Red Hat advisories where applicable.
Check LibRaw upstream and product vendors for fixed versions or backports.
Restrict processing of untrusted image files until updates are applied.
Isolate image conversion services with least privilege and sandboxing.
Monitor vendor advisories for corrected package versions.
Validation and detection
Inventory direct and bundled LibRaw usage across applications and containers.
Check whether deployed builds match commits 0b56545 or d20315b.
Review SBOMs and package manifests for LibRaw dependencies.
Prioritize systems accepting external image uploads or automated file ingestion.
Confirm Red Hat errata applicability to installed packages.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-129: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
16Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-129 · source CWE mapping
Improper Validation of Array Index
Improper Validation of Array Index represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.