InDesign Desktop versions 21.0, 19.5.5 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A malicious InDesign file could corrupt application memory and run attacker-controlled code with the victim’s user permissions. An attacker must persuade a user to open the file, but successful exploitation could expose data, alter files, or disrupt the workstation.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for systems whose users routinely exchange external design files. The required user interaction reduces immediacy compared with network-exploitable flaws, but potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact is high. Escalate promptly where exposed users hold elevated privileges or access sensitive information.
Technical view
CVE-2026-21304 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in Adobe InDesign Desktop. It has CVSS 3.1 score 7.8 and vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. The supplied description identifies versions 21.0, 19.5.5, and earlier, although the structured affected-version data is inconsistent.
Likely exposure
Exposure is concentrated on endpoints running the identified InDesign versions, particularly where users receive or download files from untrusted sources. Exploitation is local and requires a victim to open a malicious file; it does not indicate unauthenticated remote compromise.
Exploitation context
The source bundle says exploitation requires user interaction and executes code in the current user’s context. The CVE is not listed as a CISA KEV in the supplied data, and no cited source establishes active exploitation. Absence from KEV does not prove exploitation has never occurred.
Researcher notes
The weakness is CWE-122 with low attack complexity, no required privileges, and required user interaction. Scope remains unchanged, while confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are each rated high. Confirm version boundaries directly with Adobe because the supplied structured version array conflicts with the narrative description.
Mitigation direction
Review Adobe advisory APSB26-02 for authoritative affected-version and remediation guidance.
Apply the Adobe-supported remediation identified by the advisory across affected endpoints.
Warn users not to open unexpected or untrusted InDesign-compatible files.
Limit user privileges where operationally practical to reduce post-exploitation impact.
Validation and detection
Inventory installed InDesign versions and compare them with Adobe APSB26-02.
Confirm the vendor-prescribed remediation is installed on every affected endpoint.
Verify software-management reports show no remaining vulnerable installations.
Review security telemetry for suspicious files opened by InDesign and unexpected child processes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-122 · source CWE mapping
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.