LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-21248: Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A memory-handling flaw in Windows Hyper-V could let an already authorized local attacker run code and compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Successful exploitation requires low privileges and user interaction. The supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation, but affected Hyper-V systems should be updated promptly because impact could be severe.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority patching issue, especially for shared or sensitive virtualization hosts. It is not supported as an unauthenticated remote emergency: local authorization and user interaction are required, and no active exploitation evidence is supplied. Track remediation to completion rather than relying only on perimeter controls.

Technical view

CVE-2026-21248 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in Windows Hyper-V. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 7.3: local access, low complexity, low privileges, and user interaction are required; scope remains unchanged, while confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are high.

Likely exposure

The bundle lists multiple Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server builds from 2016 through 2025, including Server Core variants. Exposure should be assessed first on listed systems running Hyper-V workloads. The sources provided do not clarify whether merely installing an affected Windows build is sufficient for exploitability.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is local, requires an authorized low-privilege attacker, and depends on user interaction. The record is not marked as CISA KEV, and the supplied sources provide no evidence of active exploitation. KEV absence alone does not prove exploitation is not occurring.

Researcher notes

The title says remote code execution, while the description and CVSS vector characterize the attack path as local. Assessment should follow Microsoft's detailed advisory before drawing trust-boundary conclusions. The bundle provides no exploit mechanics, affected-configuration prerequisites, update identifiers, or named workaround, limiting deeper exposure analysis.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft's advisory for applicable security updates and deployment requirements.
  • Prioritize listed Windows systems running Hyper-V or hosting sensitive workloads.
  • Apply vendor-provided updates through established Windows patch-management processes.
  • Use vendor guidance for any compensating controls when immediate patching is impossible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory listed Windows editions, versions, and build numbers across the environment.
  • Identify which affected systems run Hyper-V or support virtualization workloads.
  • Confirm the applicable Microsoft security update is installed on each exposed system.
  • Retest update compliance and investigate failed or deferred installations.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-21248 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C1.35.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-21248Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19044.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H310.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 25H210.0.26200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 26H110.0.28000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 26H110.0.28000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.