LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-21221: Capability Access Management Service (camsvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Capability Access Management Service (camsvc) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

HighCVSS 7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in attacker with limited privileges could exploit a timing flaw in a Windows service to gain higher local privileges. Successful exploitation could give the attacker broad control over data, system settings, and availability. The attack requires local access and difficult timing, which reduces likelihood but not impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority patching issue, especially on shared endpoints and Windows Server 2025 systems with local user access. It is not documented here as actively exploited, so emergency isolation is generally unsupported by the supplied evidence. Complete exposure identification and vendor-update deployment through the normal accelerated security-update process.

Technical view

CVE-2026-21221 is a local elevation-of-privilege vulnerability in Windows Capability Access Management Service. Improper synchronization during concurrent access creates a race condition associated with CWE-362 and CWE-416. CVSS 3.1 is 7.0: low privileges, no user interaction, high attack complexity, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure exists on Windows 11 24H2, Windows 11 25H2, Windows Server 2025, and Server Core installations listed in the advisory. Exploitation requires an authorized local attacker, so systems permitting user sessions or already experiencing credential compromise warrant particular attention. The bundle does not identify every vulnerable or corrected build.

Exploitation context

The supplied record does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. The vector marks exploit maturity as unproven. Exploitation is local, requires low existing privileges, and has high complexity, suggesting it is more useful after initial access than as an entry point.

Researcher notes

The source describes concurrent shared-resource access with improper synchronization and maps the issue to both race condition and use-after-free categories. The bundle provides no exploit mechanics, affected component versions beyond operating-system builds, corrected builds, or detection indicators. Validation should therefore rely on Microsoft’s CVE-specific update applicability and enterprise patch telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s advisory and deploy the security update applicable to each affected Windows release.
  • Prioritize multi-user endpoints, administrative workstations, and servers where untrusted users can obtain local sessions.
  • Restrict unnecessary local accounts and interactive access while update deployment is pending.
  • Monitor Microsoft guidance for corrected build numbers or additional mitigation details.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows editions, releases, and build numbers against the affected products in Microsoft’s advisory.
  • Use endpoint or patch-management reporting to confirm the CVE-specific Microsoft update is installed.
  • Investigate unexpected privilege elevation or privileged process activity originating from ordinary user sessions.
  • Recheck Microsoft’s advisory for revisions affecting product scope, builds, or remediation requirements.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-362: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-21221 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C15.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-21221Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 25H210.0.26200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-362 · source CWE mapping

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.