LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-20947: Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated attacker with network access to an affected SharePoint Server could exploit a SQL injection flaw to run code. Successful exploitation could expose, alter, or disrupt SharePoint data and services. The 8.8 CVSS score reflects high potential business impact, although the supplied sources do not report active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize prompt remediation because successful exploitation could provide extensive control over a business-critical collaboration platform. Confirm exposure immediately and schedule Microsoft’s security update through an expedited change process. Give highest priority to broadly reachable systems and environments serving many authenticated or third-party users.

Technical view

CVE-2026-20947 is CWE-89 SQL injection caused by improper neutralization of SQL command elements. It requires low privileges, network access, low attack complexity, and no user interaction. Successful exploitation can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The supplied bundle does not identify the vulnerable component, exact build ranges, or attack prerequisites beyond authorization.

Likely exposure

Potentially exposed organizations operate Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, SharePoint Server 2019, or SharePoint Server Subscription Edition. Risk is greater where authenticated users can reach the vulnerable service over a network. The supplied version data only states 16.0.0, so administrators should use Microsoft’s advisory to determine exact build applicability.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not substantiate active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV. That does not prove exploitation is absent. Exploitation requires an authorized account but no user interaction, making compromised or malicious low-privilege accounts a relevant threat scenario.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports authenticated network RCE through SQL injection with CVSS 3.1 score 8.8. The bundle does not provide the vulnerable endpoint, component, exact build boundaries, update identifiers, indicators of compromise, or confirmed exploitation telemetry. Validation should therefore rely on Microsoft’s current applicability data and defensive review, without assuming every 16.0.0-labelled installation is vulnerable.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s CVE advisory for affected builds and the applicable security update.
  • Install Microsoft’s security update using established SharePoint servicing procedures.
  • Restrict network access to SharePoint where broad access is unnecessary.
  • Monitor authenticated SharePoint activity for unusual database-related errors or unexpected process behavior.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed SharePoint editions, versions, build numbers, and externally reachable instances.
  • Compare each build against Microsoft’s current CVE applicability and update information.
  • Confirm the applicable security update installed successfully on every SharePoint server.
  • Review security, application, and SharePoint logs for suspicious authenticated activity.
  • Verify normal farm operation after updating, including search, workflows, and content access.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-20947 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C2.85.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-20947Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 201616.0.0Listed
MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Server 201916.0.0Listed
MicrosoftMicrosoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition16.0.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.