LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-20212: Cisco Nexus 3000 and 9000 Series Switches Silicon One Hardware Abstraction Layer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Silicon One integration for Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute code with root privileges. This vulnerability exists because TCP ports 43210 and 43211 are accessible in the default Layer 3 (L3) virtual routing and forwarding (VRF). A successful exploit could allow the attacker to connect to an affected device and send crafted input that could be executed as code with root privileges. The exploitation of this vulnerability could also cause the S1HAL process to crash, which could cause the device to reload.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Affected Cisco switches may expose two network services that let an unauthenticated attacker run code as root. Successful exploitation could provide full device control or crash a critical process and reload the switch, creating serious confidentiality, integrity, and availability risk.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate network-infrastructure priority. Identify potentially affected switches and externally or internally reachable ports first, then follow Cisco's remediation guidance. Prioritize devices supporting critical services because exploitation could combine privileged compromise with disruptive switch reloads.

Technical view

The Silicon One integration exposes TCP ports 43210 and 43211 in the default Layer 3 VRF. Crafted input sent remotely to an affected device may execute as root or crash the S1HAL process, potentially reloading the device. CVSS 3.1 is 9.8: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Highest risk applies where affected Cisco NX-OS versions run on relevant Nexus hardware and ports 43210 or 43211 are reachable from untrusted or compromised networks. The bundle lists NX-OS versions but provides no CPEs, and its title and description differ on whether Nexus 3000 is affected.

Exploitation context

The supplied record is not marked as CISA KEV, and no supplied source states that exploitation is active. This does not prove exploitation is absent. The remote, unauthenticated path, root-level outcome, and possible switch reload make reachable devices urgent targets for assessment.

Researcher notes

CWE-1327 and the record indicate an unintended listening-port exposure leading to crafted-input code execution. The supplied evidence does not describe the parsing flaw, affected hardware matrix, fixed versions, workarounds, indicators of compromise, or exploit availability. The title includes Nexus 3000 and 9000, while the description specifically names Nexus 9000.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for confirmed affected hardware, fixed releases, and supported remediation.
  • Upgrade affected devices according to Cisco guidance when a fixed release is identified.
  • Restrict untrusted access to TCP ports 43210 and 43211 where operationally safe.
  • Reduce management and default VRF exposure using existing network segmentation controls.
  • Increase monitoring for S1HAL crashes, unexpected reloads, and connections to the affected ports.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Nexus models, NX-OS releases, and Silicon One usage against Cisco's advisory.
  • Determine whether TCP ports 43210 and 43211 are reachable through the default Layer 3 VRF.
  • Confirm filtering from untrusted and compromised network segments without disrupting required operations.
  • Review device logs and monitoring records for S1HAL crashes, unexpected reloads, or suspicious connections.
  • After remediation, verify installed software and repeat controlled reachability checks.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1327: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-20212 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9cisco

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-20212Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco NX-OS Software10.3(1), 10.3(2), 10.3(3), 10.4(1), 10.3(99w), 10.3(3w), 10.3(99x), 10.3(3o), 10.3(4), 10.3(3p), 10.3(4a), 10.4(2), 10.3(3q), 10.3(5), 10.4(3), 10.3(3x), 10.3(4g), 10.5(1), 10.3(3r), 10.3(6), 10.4(4), 10.3(4h), 10.5(2), 10.3(7), 10.4(5), 10.5(3), 10.4(4g), 10.5(4), 10.6(1), 10.5(3t), 10.3(8), 10.4(6), 10.5(3s), 10.5(3e), 10.5(3o), 10.6(1s), 10.6(2), 10.5(3p), 10.3(9), 10.6(2s), 10.6(3), 10.4(7), 10.5(5), 10.6(2n), 10.6(3s)unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1327 · source CWE mapping

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.