Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pgcrypto allows a ciphertext provider to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21 are affected.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-2005 is a PostgreSQL pgcrypto memory corruption flaw. A user who can supply ciphertext to vulnerable pgcrypto processing may be able to run code as the database operating-system account. That can compromise data confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or multi-tenant databases first. This is high urgency because successful exploitation can execute code as the database OS user, but the provided evidence does not prove active exploitation.
Technical view
The source describes a heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pgcrypto, mapped to CWE-120 and CWE-122. Affected releases are before PostgreSQL 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8 with network attack vector, low privileges, no user interaction, and high CIA impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where PostgreSQL uses pgcrypto and accepts ciphertext from authenticated users, applications, tenants, or integrations. Systems below the fixed PostgreSQL versions should be treated as affected unless vendor packaging says otherwise.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires low privileges and no user interaction, but the bundle does not provide public exploit maturity or detailed preconditions beyond ciphertext provision.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on pgcrypto presence, reachable ciphertext-processing paths, authentication boundaries, and vendor package status. Avoid assuming all PostgreSQL databases are exploitable; pgcrypto use and attacker ability to influence ciphertext are important exposure qualifiers.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade PostgreSQL to 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, 14.21, or later.
Apply relevant vendor updates, including Red Hat errata where applicable.
Confirm distribution packages backport the pgcrypto fix if version strings differ.
Restrict untrusted access to pgcrypto-dependent workflows until patched.
Review database OS account privileges and harden containment around PostgreSQL.
Validation and detection
Inventory PostgreSQL versions across managed, self-hosted, and containerized deployments.
Check whether the pgcrypto extension is installed or used by applications.
Compare installed versions against the fixed PostgreSQL release thresholds.
Verify vendor advisory status for Red Hat or downstream packages.
Review monitoring for unexplained PostgreSQL crashes around pgcrypto workloads.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
35Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.