LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19847: TOTOLINK A800R wps.so cstecgi.cgi setWiFiWpsConfig stack-based overflow

A security flaw has been discovered in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Affected is the function setWiFiWpsConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component wps.so. The manipulation of the argument pin results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A memory-corruption flaw in one identified TOTOLINK A800R firmware version could let a remote, authenticated attacker disrupt the router or potentially take control. Public exploit material exists, increasing near-term risk, but the supplied sources do not confirm active exploitation or a vendor fix.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed affected devices as urgent, especially when management access crosses untrusted networks. Public exploit availability raises risk, while remediation status remains unclear. Reduce administrative exposure immediately and obtain vendor guidance or plan device replacement.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19847 is a stack-based buffer overflow in setWiFiWpsConfig within wps.so, reached through /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Manipulating the pin argument triggers the flaw. The CVSS 2.0 vector indicates network access, low complexity, and single authentication, with possible confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to confirmed TOTOLINK A800R devices running 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Risk is greatest where the affected management CGI is reachable by untrusted users or compromised credentials. Other models and firmware versions are not established as affected by this source bundle.

Exploitation context

A public exploit is referenced, so technically capable attackers may reproduce the issue. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV, and the supplied sources provide no evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates authentication is required.

Researcher notes

The affected function, endpoint, argument, and exact firmware are identified, but the supplied evidence does not establish exploitation in the wild, reliable code execution, affected adjacent versions, or an official patch. Avoid expanding the affected range without vendor confirmation or controlled validation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and prioritize A800R devices running the affected firmware.
  • Restrict router management access to trusted administrative networks and users.
  • Check TOTOLINK guidance for a corrected firmware or supported remediation.
  • Replace or isolate affected devices if no vendor-supported correction is available.
  • Review and rotate administrative credentials where compromise is suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each device model and exact installed firmware version.
  • Determine whether the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for unusual requests involving cstecgi.cgi or WPS configuration.
  • Investigate unexplained router crashes, restarts, or configuration changes.
  • Verify remediation against current TOTOLINK guidance before closing findings.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19847 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19847Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TOTOLINKA800R4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.