LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19844: TOTOLINK A800R ipv6.so cstecgi.cgi setRadvdCfg stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. The impacted element is the function setRadvdCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component ipv6.so. Performing a manipulation of the argument radvdinterfacename results in stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in one identified TOTOLINK A800R firmware version could let an authenticated remote attacker crash the router or potentially take control by sending an oversized interface-name value. Public exploit material exists, increasing urgency, but the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation or identify a vendor patch.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed affected devices as an urgent remediation item, especially when management access crosses untrusted networks. Prioritize isolation and vendor guidance immediately. Public exploit material raises the likelihood of attempted abuse, although the supplied evidence does not confirm attacks in the wild.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19844 is a stack-based buffer overflow in setRadvdCfg within ipv6.so, reached through /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Manipulating radvdinterfacename can corrupt stack memory. The supplied CVSS v2 vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, required authentication, and potentially complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is supported only for TOTOLINK A800R firmware 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Risk is greatest where the management CGI interface is remotely reachable or credentials are compromised. The source bundle does not establish whether other versions are affected or whether default configurations expose the endpoint externally.

Exploitation context

A public proof of concept is referenced, so practical attack research is available. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms active exploitation. Authentication is indicated by the supplied CVSS vector, which reduces exposure but does not eliminate risk from stolen credentials or internal attackers.

Researcher notes

The reported sink is setRadvdCfg in ipv6.so, invoked through cstecgi.cgi, with radvdinterfacename as the triggering argument. Classification includes CWE-119 and CWE-121. Public exploit material is referenced, but the bundle provides no vendor advisory, fixed version, observed exploitation, or evidence extending the affected range beyond the named build.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory TOTOLINK A800R devices and record their exact firmware versions.
  • Restrict router administration interfaces to trusted management networks.
  • Disable internet-facing management access where operationally possible.
  • Protect administrative credentials and review accounts for unauthorized changes.
  • Check TOTOLINK guidance for patched firmware or approved mitigations.
  • Replace affected devices if no supported remediation becomes available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether firmware 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730 is installed.
  • Verify /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi is unreachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review firewall and remote-management settings for unintended exposure.
  • Check authentication and configuration logs for suspicious administrative activity.
  • Confirm any vendor-provided update is installed and persists after reboot.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19844 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19844Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TOTOLINKA800R4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.