LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19821: Tenda AC12 httpd web management interface SetSysAutoRebbotCfg formSetRebootTimer buffer overflow

A vulnerability was determined in Tenda AC12 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01. This vulnerability affects the function formSetRebootTimer of the file /goform/SetSysAutoRebbotCfg of the component httpd web management interface. This manipulation of the argument rebootTime causes buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remotely reachable flaw in the Tenda AC12 management interface can corrupt memory when processing a reboot-schedule setting. Successful exploitation could compromise the router’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The confirmed affected firmware is 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01, and the supplied scoring indicates authentication is required.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed affected devices as urgent, especially where management access crosses trust boundaries. Immediately reduce interface exposure, identify the accountable device owner, and obtain current remediation guidance from Tenda. Replacement should be considered if a supported fixed firmware cannot be confirmed.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19821 is a buffer overflow in formSetRebootTimer within the httpd endpoint /goform/SetSysAutoRebbotCfg. An improperly handled rebootTime argument triggers the issue. It is classified under CWE-119 and CWE-120. The supplied CVSS 2.0 score is 9.0 with complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Likely exposure

Exposure is confirmed only for Tenda AC12 firmware 15.03.06.23_multi_TD01. Devices are at greatest risk when their web management interface is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The supplied CVSS vector indicates that authenticated access is required.

Exploitation context

A public technical disclosure and proof-of-concept reference exist, meaning attackers can study the vulnerability. The supplied bundle says exploitation may be possible, but the CVE is not listed in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The endpoint, vulnerable argument, affected firmware, public disclosure, and memory-corruption class are identified. However, the supplied sources do not establish a vendor patch, reliable compromise indicators, active exploitation, or whether other AC12 firmware versions are affected. Avoid extrapolating beyond the named release.

Mitigation direction

  • Block internet and untrusted-network access to the AC12 management interface.
  • Restrict management access to authorized administrators on a dedicated trusted network.
  • Check Tenda guidance for corrected firmware; no fixed release is identified in the supplied sources.
  • Replace or isolate affected devices if no supported fixed firmware is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda AC12 devices and record their exact firmware versions.
  • Verify whether each management interface is reachable from internet or untrusted network segments.
  • Review access logs for requests to /goform/SetSysAutoRebbotCfg and unexplained configuration changes or restarts.
  • Confirm management authentication uses authorized accounts and remove unnecessary access.
  • After mitigation, verify network restrictions and any vendor-recommended firmware update.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19821 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19821Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaAC1215.03.06.23_multi_TD01Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.