LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19814: TOTOLINK A800R firewall.so cstecgi.cgi setMacQos stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Affected is the function setMacQos of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component firewall.so. Performing a manipulation of the argument macAddress results in stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A publicly documented flaw affects one identified TOTOLINK A800R firmware release. A remote, authenticated attacker may trigger memory corruption through the router’s management interface, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Public proof-of-concept material raises urgency, although the supplied evidence does not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat affected, reachable devices as an urgent remediation priority because public proof-of-concept material exists and the stated impact is severe. Prioritize externally manageable routers first. Do not interpret the public exploit reference as proof of active attacks; current exploitation evidence is incomplete.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19814 is a stack-based buffer overflow in setMacQos within firewall.so, reached through /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Manipulating macAddress affects A800R firmware 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. The CVSS v2 vector indicates network access, low complexity, single authentication, and potentially complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is established only for TOTOLINK A800R firmware 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Risk is greatest where the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks or compromised internal systems. The supplied evidence does not establish whether other firmware versions are affected.

Exploitation context

A public proof of concept is referenced, and the vulnerability can reportedly be initiated remotely. The CVSS vector indicates single authentication is required. CVE-2026-19814 is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The record identifies CWE-119 and CWE-121 and assigns CVSS v2 9.0. Public technical material is referenced, but exploit reliability, achieved execution, broader affected-version range, and a fixed release are not established by the supplied evidence. Avoid intrusive validation on production routers.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify A800R devices running the affected firmware.
  • Restrict router management access to trusted administrative networks and users.
  • Disable internet-facing management access where operationally possible.
  • Check TOTOLINK guidance for fixed firmware or vendor-approved mitigation.
  • Consider replacing affected devices if no supported remediation is available.

Validation and detection

  • Verify device models and firmware versions against the affected release.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review administrative access controls and credential hygiene.
  • Review device and upstream logs for unusual management requests or crashes.
  • Confirm any vendor-recommended firmware update or mitigation remains applied.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19814 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19814Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TOTOLINKA800R4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.