LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-19790: Tenda G0 httpd Web Management module formSetPortMirror stack-based overflow

A vulnerability was identified in Tenda G0 up to 20260625. This issue affects the function formSetPortMirror of the file /goform/module of the component httpd Web Management Interface. Such manipulation of the argument portMirrorMirroredPorts leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A crafted request to the Tenda G0 management interface can overflow memory in its web service. Successful abuse by a user with required access could compromise the device’s confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Public exploit material increases urgency, but the supplied evidence does not show active exploitation or identify a vendor fix.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent network-device exposure review. Immediately remove affected management interfaces from untrusted access paths, identify deployed firmware, and seek confirmed vendor remediation. Prioritize internet-accessible and broadly reachable devices first. Public exploit availability warrants speed, but current sources do not establish active exploitation.

Technical view

CVE-2026-19790 is a remotely reachable stack-based buffer overflow in Tenda G0 httpd. A crafted portMirrorMirroredPorts value processed by formSetPortMirror at /goform/module triggers the flaw. The CVSS v2 score is 9.0 with complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts; its Au:S vector indicates authentication is required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where affected Tenda G0 management interfaces are reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. Devices accessible only through restricted administrative networks have reduced exposure. The description says versions through 20260625 are affected, while structured data explicitly names 20260625; exact earlier-version coverage remains uncertain.

Exploitation context

Public proof-of-concept material is referenced, increasing the likelihood of attempted abuse. The supplied bundle marks KEV false and contains no evidence of observed in-the-wild exploitation. Authentication is indicated by the CVSS vector, although the precise privilege or session requirements are not documented.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies formSetPortMirror, /goform/module, portMirrorMirroredPorts, and CWE-119/CWE-121. Version wording is inconsistent: the narrative says up to 20260625, while structured affected data lists 20260625. No vendor advisory, fixed release, attack telemetry, detailed authentication prerequisite, or root-cause analysis is supplied.

Mitigation direction

  • Disable internet-facing remote management and restrict the Web interface to trusted administrative networks.
  • Check Tenda guidance for corrected firmware; no fix is identified in the supplied sources.
  • Limit administrative accounts and rotate credentials if unauthorized access is suspected.
  • Monitor management access and configuration changes until corrective firmware is confirmed.
  • Isolate or replace affected devices if vendor remediation remains unavailable.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda G0 devices and record their installed firmware versions.
  • Determine whether the Web Management Interface is reachable from internet, user, guest, or vendor networks.
  • Verify remote administration is disabled or restricted to authorized management hosts.
  • Review available logs for unexpected administrative sessions or port-mirroring configuration changes.
  • Use isolated laboratory validation; do not run the public proof of concept against production devices.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-19790 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-19790Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaG020260625Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.